info@societejuridique.com
Madrid: Paseo de la Castellana 216 8 ª Planta
Alicante: Av. Ansaldo Nº31, local 16
24h emergencies: 669 30 21 13

Social media:

Shareholder disputes · corporate crime

Shareholder disputes: when the conflict turns criminal

Criminal defence throughout Spain · offices in Madrid and Alicante

Most disputes between shareholders are resolved on commercial-law ground. But there is a point at which a partner’s or director’s conduct stops being poor management and becomes an offence. Identifying that point with precision decides whether the criminal route helps or backfires.

In brief. A criminal complaint without a solid basis does not merely get dismissed: it strengthens the opponent’s position and can expose the complainant to proceedings for false accusation and to costs. Often the correct sequence is commercial first, criminal afterwards, using the civil proceedings to fix the facts that will later sustain the criminal route.

Why it is different

1
A badly framed criminal complaint is not merely dismissed: it strengthens the opponent and exposes the complainant.
2
Offices in Madrid and Alicante; assistance anywhere in Spain.
LIWARD
Our own methodology of legal intelligence and forensic analysis.

When the corporate conflict crosses the criminal frontier

Most disputes between shareholders are resolved on commercial ground: challenges to resolutions, corporate and individual liability actions, information rights, separation or exclusion of a shareholder. But there is a point at which the conduct of the partner or the director ceases to be a bad management decision and becomes an offence. Identifying precisely where that point lies is what decides whether the criminal route is advisable or counterproductive.

Filing a criminal complaint without a solid basis does not merely end in dismissal: it reinforces the opponent’s position and can expose the complainant to proceedings for false accusation or simulation of an offence and to an award of costs. For that reason we analyse the documentation before advising either route.

Types of offence

The criminal figures of the corporate conflict

Art. 252 CP

Disloyal administration

The director who exceeds their powers and causes harm to the administered assets: unapproved remuneration, related-party contracts, diversion of business opportunities. Penalty: that of fraud (Articles 249 and 250).
Art. 253 CP

Misappropriation

Diverting or appropriating money, effects or assets received in deposit, commission or administration: private use of the company’s cash is its most frequent form. Penalty: that of fraud (Articles 249 and 250).
Art. 290 CP

Falsification of the annual accounts

De facto or de jure directors who falsify the accounts or other documents apt to reflect the company’s legal or economic position, capable of causing harm. Penalty: one to three years and a fine; upper half where harm is caused.
Art. 291 CP

Imposition of abusive resolutions

Taking advantage of a majority position at the general meeting or on the board to impose abusive resolutions to the detriment of the other shareholders and without benefit to the company. Penalty: six months to three years or a fine.
Art. 292 CP

Harmful resolutions by fictitious majority

A harmful resolution adopted with a manufactured majority: abuse of a blank signature, improper attribution of voting rights or unlawful denial of the vote to those entitled. Penalty: six months to three years or a fine.
Art. 293 CP

Denial of shareholder rights

Preventing, without legal cause, the exercise of the rights of information, participation in management, control of the activity or pre-emptive subscription recognised by law. Penalty: a fine of six to twelve months.
Art. 294 CP

Obstruction of supervision

Refusing or impeding the action of inspecting or supervisory persons, bodies or entities in companies subject to administrative supervision or operating in supervised markets. Penalty: six months to three years or a fine.
Art. 257 CP

Asset concealment

Emptying the company or the personal estate to evade liabilities towards the shareholder or the creditors: the typical conduct of the final phase of the conflict. Penalty: one to four years of imprisonment and a fine.
Arts. 390–392 CP

Document forgery

Minutes of meetings that never took place, certifications for the Companies Registry, backdated contracts or accounts filed without underlying support. Penalty: for a commercial document, six months to three years and a fine.
Penalties at a glance

Summary of indicative penalties

OffenceArticlePenalty frameworkKey aggravating factor
Disloyal administration252That of fraud (249/250)Amount · abuse of the company signature
Misappropriation253That of fraud (249/250)Amount · basic necessities
Falsified accounts2901 – 3 years and fineHarm caused: upper half
Abusive resolutions2916 months – 3 years or fineAbuse of the majority position
Fictitious majority2926 months – 3 years or fineBlank signature · improper vote
Shareholder rights293Fine of 6 to 12 monthsInformation, management and control
Asset concealment2571 – 4 years and fineSought insolvency · front men
Legal person31 bisFine · suspension · dissolutionAbsence of a compliance programme

Penalty ranges are indicative and set out the ordinary framework; the sentence actually imposed depends on the degree of completion, aggravating and mitigating circumstances and the specific facts of each case.

Our differentiator

Where the corporate conflict meets forensic analysis

In a case between shareholders the evidence is accounting, registry and digital: the annual accounts and their filing, books and minutes, bank movements, related-party contracts, e-mails, messages and the trail of transactions in the Companies Registry. Whoever organises that documentation first fixes the narrative of the proceedings. For that reason we apply LIWARD, Legal Intelligence Warfare for Defense, our own methodology, which integrates legal intelligence, case-law analytics, financial and accounting analysis and e-forensics into a single procedural strategy. We coordinate the criminal route with the corporate litigation, precisely so that the facts fixed in the civil proceedings later sustain the criminal one.

01

Legal intelligence

02

Financial and accounting analysis

03

Digital evidence · e-forensic

04

Procedural strategy

How we intervene

A strategy sustained through every phase

Phase 01

Documentary analysis and route selection

Phase 02

Interim measures and asset tracing

Phase 03

Strategy and evidence

Phase 04

Trial and appeals

Who we represent

Each profile demands a distinct defence

S

Minority shareholders

Shareholders excluded from information and profits: private prosecution, interim measures and recovery of the value taken from the company.

A

Directors and board members

Defence against the disgruntled shareholder’s complaint: proving an informed decision, absence of personal interest and action within the corporate purpose.

E

Companies and family businesses

Generational transition, breakdown of trust and deadlocked organs: containment of reputational damage and continuity of the business.

I

Investors and creditors

Those who contributed funds and watch the company being emptied: asset concealment, traceability of the assets and directors’ liability.

FAQ

What to know before the first consultation

When does a management disagreement stop being that and start being an offence?
When the director exceeds their powers and causes harm to the administered assets, or when the majority shareholder imposes resolutions that benefit only themselves. An unfortunate, risky or unpopular decision is not an offence; remuneration nobody approved, a contract with the director’s own company or diversion of clients can be.
Is the criminal route or the commercial route better for me?
It depends on the available evidence and the objective. The commercial route offers challenges to resolutions, liability actions and information rights; the criminal route adds investigative capacity and interim measures, but requires a solid classification. Filing a complaint without a basis strengthens the opponent and can turn against the complainant. Often the correct sequence is commercial first, criminal afterwards.
What is business judgment and how does it protect the director?
It is the protection of strategic and business decisions taken in good faith, without personal interest, with sufficient information and under an adequate procedure. Well documented (prior reports, minutes, external advice), it closes the criminal route, because it shows the decision fell within the legitimate margin of management even if the result was poor.
I suspect the company is being emptied. What can I do right now?
Act quickly and on documents: request corporate information, verify the filing of accounts, review the Companies Registry trail and request interim measures over assets to prevent their departure. Asset concealment is proven with transfers, sales to related parties and the appearance of front men.
What documentation is needed to sustain the case?
Annual accounts and their filing, books and minutes, deeds and articles, the company’s bank movements, related-party contracts, payroll and board remuneration, and electronic correspondence. Without that support there is no viable complaint, and with it the director’s best defence is also built.
What is the LIWARD methodology?
It is our own methodology, Legal Intelligence Warfare for Defense, which integrates legal intelligence, financial and accounting analysis and digital forensic evidence into a single procedural strategy. It allows us to anticipate the weaknesses of the opposing case and to build on technical evidence, not on legal argument alone.

Speak to a criminal lawyer

In a fast-track case, the days you have are the case.

Criminal defence in English before the courts of Alicante and the rest of Spain, for residents and for visitors who have flown home.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
Londres: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, Reino Unido
París: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, Francia
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert es un despacho de abogados con sedes en Madrid, Alicante, Londres y París, especializado en defensa y acusación penal, delitos económicos y corporativos y derecho tecnológico. Trabajamos con orientación estratégica en procedimientos penales complejos, propiedad intelectual y análisis forense avanzado, y prestamos consultoría jurídica, compliance y escudos de protección a particulares y empresas. Atendemos desde Alicante y Madrid, con consulta online en toda España y asistencia al detenido 24 horas. Resuelva sus dudas en las preguntas frecuentes o solicite una primera consulta.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h