info@societejuridique.com
Madrid: Paseo de la Castellana 216 8 ª Planta
Alicante: Av. Ansaldo Nº31, local 16
24h emergencies: 669 30 21 13

Social media:

Criminal compliance · Article 31 bis CP

Criminal compliance for companies: no paper programmes

Design and defence · offices in Madrid and Alicante

Corporate criminal liability follows a precise logic: only the genuinely implemented model exempts. The courts examine whether the programme identifies the business’s real risks, whether the compliance body has autonomy, whether the whistleblowing channel operates, whether training is verifiable and the disciplinary response effective.

In brief. A document without a compliance culture does not survive judicial examination. Our double condition as litigating criminal lawyers and model designers makes the difference: we build programmes thinking of how a court will examine them, and we defend companies with the model as the central piece of the case.

Why it is different

31 bis
An effective compliance programme is the difference between the company’s indictment and its exemption.
50+
Law 2/2023 makes the internal whistleblowing channel mandatory from fifty employees.
LIWARD
Our own methodology of legal intelligence and forensic analysis.

Compliance admits no paper programmes

Corporate criminal liability has a precise logic: only the model that is genuinely implemented exempts. The courts analyse whether the programme identifies the real risks of the business, whether a compliance body with autonomy exists, whether the whistleblowing channel operates, whether training is verifiable and whether the disciplinary response is effective. The document without a culture of compliance does not pass the judicial examination.

Our double condition as litigation criminal lawyers and designers of models marks the difference: we build programmes thinking about how a court will examine them, and when the company is nevertheless investigated, the model becomes the central piece of the defence: the exemption of Article 31 bis or the mitigation of Article 31 quater.

Services

From the risk map to the courtroom

Art. 31 bis CP

Criminal risk map

Identification of the offences attributable to the company by activity, sector and real operations: the basis of every model. Result: a risk matrix by process.
Art. 31 bis 2 CP

Design of the prevention model

Protocols, controls and decision procedures satisfying the legal requirements of the exemption. Result: a model with evidential effectiveness.
Directive 2019/1937

Whistleblowing channel

An internal channel compliant with Law 2/2023: confidentiality, whistleblower protection and investigation management. Mandatory for companies of fifty or more employees.
Compliance body

Compliance officer

Configuration of the body with autonomous powers of initiative and control, and continued external support. Requirement: real autonomy and initiative.
Internal investigations

Corporate investigations

Investigation of reports and incidents with guarantees: e-discovery, interviews and a reasoned report, preserving their procedural usability. Key: evidence usable at trial.
Training

Compliance culture

Verifiable training of directors and employees: the courts demand proof of effective implementation. Evidence: records and periodic assessments.
Audit

Verification and improvement

Periodic audit of the model’s functioning, updates for criminal reforms and effectiveness testing. Cycle: annual review and after incidents.
Art. 31 bis 4 CP

SMEs

Proportionate models for small and medium companies: real compliance without oversized structures. Criterion: proportionality to size and risk.
Criminal defence

Defence of the legal person

Representation of the accused company: coordinated entity-director strategy and proof of the exemption. Objective: exemption or mitigation (Art. 31 quater).
What is at stake

The Article 33.7 penalties

PenaltyProvisionExtentReal impact
Fine (by instalments or proportional)33.7.aUp to five years of profitDirect impact on cash
Suspension of activities33.7.cUp to five yearsOperational paralysis
Closure of premises33.7.dUp to five yearsEstablishments shut
Prohibition of activities33.7.eTemporary or definitiveLoss of the business object
Disqualification from subsidies33.7.fUp to fifteen yearsExclusion from public contracting
Judicial intervention33.7.gUp to five yearsLoss of management control
Dissolution33.7.bDefinitiveThe company’s civil death
Interim measures33.7 in fineDuring the investigationClosure and suspension before any judgment

The applicable penalties depend on the offence in the corporate catalogue and the circumstances; several can be ordered as interim measures during the investigation.

Our differentiator

Built for the courtroom

A model is worth what it can prove. Dates certain, board minutes, training records, an operating channel, documented investigations and periodic reviews: that is what survives cross-examination. We audit existing models with judicial criteria and reinforce them where they would not withstand questioning, and when proceedings arrive we defend the entity by proving suitable design, real implementation and the individual author’s fraudulent circumvention. We apply LIWARD, Legal Intelligence Warfare for Defense, our own methodology integrating legal intelligence, financial analysis and e-forensics into a single strategy.

01

Legal intelligence

02

Financial and accounting analysis

03

Digital evidence · e-forensic

04

Procedural strategy

How we work

From design to defence

Phase 01

Risk map and model design

Phase 02

Channel, training and implementation

Phase 03

Audit and effectiveness testing

Phase 04

Defence of the entity where needed

Who we assist

Each profile demands a distinct approach

E

Companies without a model

Businesses exposed to corporate liability: design proportionate to size and risk, built for judicial examination.

M

Companies with a manual

Entities with existing programmes: audit with judicial criteria and reinforcement where they would not withstand questioning.

A

Boards and directors

Governing bodies documenting their diligence: supervision, resources and the decisions that protect them personally.

I

Companies under investigation

Entities already summoned: the model as the central piece of the exemption or mitigation defence.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

Is my company obliged to have criminal compliance?
It is not obligatory in general, but it is the only route to exemption if an employee or director offends for the company’s benefit. Law 2/2023 does make the whistleblowing channel mandatory from fifty employees. The real question is not the obligation: it is the exposure.
We already have a compliance manual. Is that enough?
Only if it is implemented, updated and its functioning can be proven: recorded training, an operating channel, documented investigations, periodic reviews. We audit existing models with judicial criteria and reinforce them where they would not withstand cross-examination.
What happens if the company is indicted despite having a model?
The model becomes the central piece of the defence: the exemption of Article 31 bis or the mitigation of Article 31 quater. We defend the entity by proving suitable design, real implementation and the individual author’s fraudulent circumvention. The evidential quality of the model decides.
How does compliance affect directors personally?
A functioning model documents the board’s diligence and protects directors from liability for defective supervision; its absence exposes them. Supervision minutes, allocated resources and responses to incidents are the personal shield of the governing body.
Do you handle matters outside Alicante?
Yes. We operate from Madrid and Alicante and assist companies anywhere in Spain.
What is the LIWARD methodology?
It is our own methodology, Legal Intelligence Warfare for Defense, which integrates legal intelligence, financial and accounting analysis and digital forensic evidence into a single procedural strategy.

Speak to a criminal lawyer

In a fast-track case, the days you have are the case.

Criminal defence in English before the courts of Alicante and the rest of Spain, for residents and for visitors who have flown home.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
Londres: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, Reino Unido
París: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, Francia
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert es un despacho de abogados con sedes en Madrid, Alicante, Londres y París, especializado en defensa y acusación penal, delitos económicos y corporativos y derecho tecnológico. Trabajamos con orientación estratégica en procedimientos penales complejos, propiedad intelectual y análisis forense avanzado, y prestamos consultoría jurídica, compliance y escudos de protección a particulares y empresas. Atendemos desde Alicante y Madrid, con consulta online en toda España y asistencia al detenido 24 horas. Resuelva sus dudas en las preguntas frecuentes o solicite una primera consulta.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h