Criminal defence throughout Spain · offices in Madrid and Alicante
Article 510 punishes fostering, promoting or inciting hatred, hostility, discrimination or violence against a group or a person on statutorily defined grounds. It is an offence of open concepts: interpretation decides the outcome.
In brief. Speech is not judged in isolation: it is judged in its context. Freedom of expression protects ideas that offend, disturb or upset; the offence requires real capacity to incite hatred, hostility, discrimination or violence, or an effective injury to the dignity of the group. A message taken out of context and read years later almost always looks worse than it was.
The hate-crime provision punishes fostering, promoting or inciting hatred, hostility, discrimination or violence against a group or a person on racist, antisemitic, ideological, religious grounds, or by reason of national or ethnic origin, sexual orientation or identity, gender, family situation, illness or disability. It further punishes the production and dissemination of materials apt for that purpose, the denial or gross trivialisation of genocide and crimes against humanity, and humiliation or contempt injuring the dignity of those groups.
The boundary with freedom of expression lies in the real capacity of the conduct to incite discrimination, hostility or violence, and in the creation of an effective danger for the dignity of a group. The defence is therefore built on the full context: who said it, before whom, in what circumstances, with what actual reach, with what intention and at what moment.
| Conduct | Article | Penalty framework | Deciding factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Incitement to hatred | 510.1 | 1 – 4 years and fine | Real capacity to incite |
| Humiliation and contempt | 510.2 | 6 months – 2 years and fine | Effective injury to dignity |
| Public or internet dissemination | 510.3 | Penalty in its upper half | Number of recipients reached |
| Risk to public peace | 510.4 | Penalty one degree higher | Feeling of insecurity in the group |
| Professional disqualification | 510.5 | Special disqualification | Teaching, sport or leisure sphere |
| Glorification of terrorism | 578 | 1 – 3 years and fine | Internet dissemination: upper half |
| Discrimination aggravation | 22.4 | Aggravates the ordinary offence | Proof of the discriminatory motive |
| Legal person | 510 bis · 31 bis | Fine · Article 33.7 penalties | Absence of a compliance programme |
Penalty ranges are indicative and set out the ordinary framework; the sentence actually imposed depends on the circumstances of each case.
In hate crimes the evidence is almost always documentary and digital: screenshots, publications recovered years later, videos of a chant, recordings of a rally, decontextualised conversation threads. That evidence must be authenticated, dated and placed in context before a court can weigh it, and its technical challenge, authorship of the account, integrity of the capture, real reach of the publication, is often the decisive defence. We apply LIWARD, Legal Intelligence Warfare for Defense, our own methodology integrating legal intelligence, case-law analytics and e-forensics into a single procedural strategy.
Those investigated over publications, chants or statements: authentication, context and the boundary with freedom of expression.
Persons and collectives targeted by hate speech or discrimination: preservation of evidence, identification of anonymous profiles and private prosecution.
Associations, clubs and media facing liability for third-party content: prevention programmes and defence of the entity.
Politicians, creators and communicators whose past publications are reported: context, intent and proportionality of removal measures.
Speak to a criminal lawyer
Criminal defence in English before the courts of Alicante and the rest of Spain, for residents and for visitors who have flown home.