Article 801 Spanish Criminal Procedure Act: Immediate Sentence on a Guilty Plea before the Duty Court

Article 801 of the Criminal Procedure Act allows a case to be concluded on the same day, before the duty court, with a sentence reduced by one third. It applies where there is no private accuser, where the offence charged carries up to three years of imprisonment, and where the sentence sought, after the one third reduction, does not exceed two years. For a foreign national arrested in Spain this provision is frequently the difference between resolving the matter before leaving the country and returning months later for a trial, and the court may declare the judgment final immediately and rule at once on suspension of the sentence.

Wording of Article 801 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act

Requirements and procedure

1. Absence of a private accuser at the hearing, or, under paragraph 5, a plea entered in the defence pleading to the most serious accusation where one has appeared.
2. An offence classified as punishable by imprisonment of up to three years, by a fine of any amount, or by another penalty not exceeding ten years.
3. A penalty sought which, reduced by one third, does not exceed two years of imprisonment. Where several penalties are sought, their sum is taken.
4. A plea that is free, informed and given with knowledge of its consequences, reviewed by the court in accordance with article 787.

Defence strategy

Assessing whether the plea is genuinely advantageous. The reduction of one third is substantial, but it is accepted in exchange for a conviction that will be recorded and that may affect residence applications, professional registration and future travel. The decision is taken only after the file has been examined, because a prosecution that appears strong at the duty court frequently rests on an identification, an analysis or a statement that would not survive examination at trial. The reduction should never be accepted before the material has been read.

Negotiating the classification, not only the penalty. The prosecutor’s figure derives from the classification, so the productive negotiation is over the offence charged rather than over the years sought: the application of a reduced bracket, the exclusion of an aggravating circumstance, the recognition of reparation or of an addiction. Each of these lowers the starting point before the one third reduction operates, and it is what brings the final figure below the two year limit that this article requires.

Securing suspension at the same hearing. Paragraph 3 relaxes the ordinary requirements: an undertaking to pay the civil liability, and an undertaking to obtain the certificate of treatment, suffice for suspension to be granted at once. The defence therefore attends the duty court with the undertakings drafted, the means of payment identified and, where addiction is relevant, contact already established with a treatment centre. This preparation is what allows the accused to leave the court at liberty and with the matter closed.

Where the case should not be resolved at the duty court. The procedure is inappropriate where the accused does not understand the charge, where no interpreter of the necessary quality is available, where the injuries have not yet stabilised so that the classification may change, or where the civil liability is contested. In those situations the correct course is to decline the plea at the duty court and preserve the possibility of pleading later under article 787, which retains the same reduction, or of contesting the case at trial.

• Plea agreements in Spain
• Guilty plea and suspension calculator
• Spanish Criminal Procedure Act by article
• Spanish-language entry

This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.