info@societejuridique.com
Madrid: Paseo de la Castellana 216 8 ª Planta
Alicante: Av. Ansaldo Nº31, local 16
24h emergencies: 669 30 21 13

Social media:

Article 579 Spanish Criminal Procedure Act: Interception of Correspondence and Postal Communications

Article 579 of the Criminal Procedure Act governs the interception, opening and examination of private, postal and telegraphic correspondence, and the observation of postal communications. It is important for two reasons that are easily missed. First, the measure is available only where the investigation concerns intentional offences punishable by at least three years, offences committed within a criminal group or organisation, or terrorism, which is the same catalogue that governs the interception of telephone and internet communications. Second, its fourth paragraph lists the cases in which no judicial authorisation is required at all, and those cases are what customs and postal inspections of parcels rely on.

Wording of Article 579 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act

1. The judge may order the detention of private, postal and telegraphic correspondence, including faxes, registered faxes and money orders, sent or received by the person under investigation, as well as its opening or examination, if there are indications that by these means the discovery or verification of some fact or circumstance relevant to the case may be obtained, provided that the investigation concerns one of the following offences:

1.º Intentional offences punishable by a penalty with a maximum limit of at least three years of imprisonment.

2.º Offences committed within a criminal group or organisation.

3.º Offences of terrorism.

2. The judge may order, by a reasoned decision, for a period of up to three months, renewable for equal or shorter periods up to a maximum of eighteen months, the observation of the postal and telegraphic communications of the person under investigation, as well as of the communications which that person uses for the purposes of his criminal activity.

3. In cases of urgency, where the investigations are carried out for the detection of offences connected with the activity of armed gangs or terrorist elements and there are well-founded reasons making the measure provided for in the preceding paragraphs indispensable, it may be ordered by the Minister of the Interior or, failing that, by the Secretary of State for Security. This measure shall be communicated immediately to the competent judge and, in any event, within a maximum period of twenty-four hours, stating the reasons that justified its adoption, the action taken, the manner in which it was carried out and its result. The competent judge shall, also by a reasoned decision, revoke or confirm that action within a maximum period of seventy-two hours from the ordering of the measure.

4. Judicial authorisation shall not be required in the following cases:

a) Postal items which, by their own external characteristics, are not usually used to contain individual correspondence but to serve the transport and traffic of goods, or on the outside of which their content is stated.

b) Other forms of sending correspondence under the legal format of open communication, in which an external declaration of content is obligatory or which incorporate an express indication that inspection is authorised.

c) Where the inspection is carried out in accordance with customs legislation, or is appropriate under the postal rules governing a particular class of item.

5. The application and the subsequent proceedings relating to the measure applied for shall be dealt with in a separate and secret file, without any need for the secrecy of the case to be expressly ordered.

Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.

Effect. The article confers powers and sets their limits rather than imposing a penalty. Its procedural consequence is that correspondence intercepted outside the catalogue of offences in the first paragraph, beyond the maximum period of eighteen months, or without the reasoned decision the second paragraph requires, is void, and so is the evidence derived from it. An urgent measure ordered administratively that is not communicated within twenty-four hours, or not confirmed within seventy-two hours, likewise falls.

Requirements and procedure

  1. An investigation concerning one of the three categories of offence listed. The measure is unavailable for offences outside them, whatever the investigative interest.
  2. A reasoned judicial decision identifying the correspondence, the person and the period, subject to a maximum of three months renewable up to eighteen.
  3. Indications that the measure will produce the discovery or verification of a fact relevant to the case, which requires objective material and not a mere hypothesis.
  4. For the cases in the fourth paragraph, that the item genuinely falls within one of them, which is determined by its external characteristics or by the applicable customs or postal rules.

Defence strategy

The offence investigated was outside the catalogue. The first thing to examine is whether the offence under investigation at the time the measure was ordered carried a maximum of at least three years, or fell within the group or terrorism categories. Where the investigation began as something less serious and the classification was raised afterwards, the authorisation was granted without a legal basis, and the material obtained is void. The defence obtains the separate and secret file in which the measure was processed and reads the application as it stood on that date.

Whether the item was correspondence at all. The fourth paragraph places outside judicial control items whose external characteristics show them to serve the transport of goods, items with a declaration of content and items inspected under customs or postal rules. Conversely, where a parcel did bear the characteristics of individual correspondence and was opened without authorisation on the assumption that it was merely goods, the opening was unlawful. This is the argument that arises in almost every case founded on a package intercepted at a postal or courier facility.

Duration, extensions and reasons. The measure is limited to three months, renewable up to eighteen. Extensions granted by standard form, without a report on the results obtained so far, and extensions granted after the previous period had expired are all challenged. The defence constructs a chronology of the decisions and their notifications, since a gap in the sequence renders void everything obtained in that interval.

Access to the separate file and the chain of custody. Because the measure is processed in a separate and secret file, the defence must apply expressly for access once the secrecy is lifted, and must then verify the chain of custody of the items intercepted: who opened them, in whose presence, whether the person under investigation or a judicial officer attended, and how the contents were recorded. Defects in the record of the opening deprive the material of evidential value even where the authorisation was lawful.

Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.

This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
Londres: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, Reino Unido
París: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, Francia
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert es un despacho de abogados con sedes en Madrid, Alicante, Londres y París, especializado en defensa y acusación penal, delitos económicos y corporativos y derecho tecnológico. Trabajamos con orientación estratégica en procedimientos penales complejos, propiedad intelectual y análisis forense avanzado, y prestamos consultoría jurídica, compliance y escudos de protección a particulares y empresas. Atendemos desde Alicante y Madrid, con consulta online en toda España y asistencia al detenido 24 horas. Resuelva sus dudas en las preguntas frecuentes o solicite una primera consulta.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h