Article 588 quater a permits the authorisation of electronic devices for the capture and recording of the direct oral communications of the investigated person, in public places or in closed premises including the dwelling, and the complementary obtaining of images where the judicial decision so provides.
1. The placing and use of electronic devices permitting the capture and recording of the direct oral communications held by the investigated person, in a public place or in another open space, in the dwelling of that person or in any other closed premises, may be authorised.
The listening and recording devices may be placed both outside and inside the dwelling or closed premises.
2. Where it is necessary to enter the dwelling or any of the spaces intended for the exercise of privacy, the authorising decision must extend its reasoning to the appropriateness of access to those places.
3. The listening to and recording of private conversations may be complemented by the obtaining of images where the judicial decision ordering it expressly so authorises.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.
Specialty of the authorisation. The measure is authorised for specific encounters and not as a general form of surveillance. A decision which authorises indefinite listening, or listening not linked to determinate meetings, exceeds the framework of Article 588 quater b and is capable of challenge in its entirety.
Reasoning as to entry into the dwelling. Paragraph 2 requires the reasoning to extend expressly to the access to the dwelling. Where the decision authorises the recording without ruling upon that access, the entry lacks judicial cover and the material obtained is unusable.
Obtaining of images without express authorisation. Paragraph 3 conditions the obtaining of images upon an express authorisation. Images captured without it are excluded, even where the recording of the sound was lawfully authorised.
Integrity of the recordings. The defence is entitled to the complete original recording and not to a selection of passages. Gaps, edits and the absence of a verified transfer of the master copy to the court are grounds which affect the evidential value of the material.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.