Article 258 punishes whoever, in judicial or administrative enforcement proceedings, presents an incomplete or untruthful list of assets and thereby delays, hinders or prevents the satisfaction of the creditor, and it provides for a full exemption where a truthful statement is presented in time.
1. Whoever, in judicial or administrative enforcement proceedings, presents to the authority or official in charge of the enforcement an incomplete or untruthful list of assets or property, and thereby delays, hinders or prevents the satisfaction of the creditor, shall be punished with imprisonment of three months to one year or a fine of six to eighteen months.
The list of assets or property shall be regarded as incomplete where the debtor subject to enforcement uses or enjoys assets belonging to third parties and does not produce sufficient justification of the right which covers that enjoyment and of the conditions to which it is subject.
2. The same penalty shall be imposed where the debtor, having been required to do so, fails to provide the list of assets or property referred to in the preceding paragraph.
3. The offences referred to in this article shall not be prosecutable if the perpetrator, before the authority or official has discovered the untruthful or incomplete character of the statement presented, appears before them and presents a truthful and complete statement of assets or property.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Rectification under paragraph 3. The provision contains a genuine ground excluding prosecution. Presenting a complete statement before the authority has discovered the defect closes the case, and identifying that window at the outset is the most effective step available.
Absence of the required result. The offence requires the satisfaction of the creditor to have been delayed, hindered or prevented. Where the assets were seized in any event, or where the debt was satisfied, the objective element fails, however defective the statement may have been.
Assets belonging to third parties. The second subparagraph of paragraph 1 imposes a duty to justify the enjoyment of assets belonging to third parties. Producing the lease, the loan or the corporate title which covers that enjoyment removes the presumption that the list was incomplete.
Intent as distinct from error. An omission arising from a mistake as to the ownership of an asset, from an accounting error or from a lack of information, without any intent to conceal, does not satisfy the subjective element. Documentary evidence of the source of the data supplied is decisive on this point.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.