info@societejuridique.com
Madrid: Paseo de la Castellana 216 8 ª Planta
Alicante: Av. Ansaldo Nº31, local 16
24h emergencies: 669 30 21 13

Social media:

Fire offences · Articles 351-358 CP · Jury trial

Fire offences: defence with fire science, not only law

Criminal defence throughout Spain · offices in Madrid and Alicante

Fire has its own title in the Criminal Code: from the blaze endangering lives (up to twenty years) to the forest fire, to burning one’s own property to collect the insurance. Heavily expert-driven cases (origin, causation, intent) tried before the Jury Court.

In brief. Origin and cause are demonstrated, not intuited: electrical, accidental or intentional. Without concrete danger to persons, Article 351 collapses into criminal damage. And the intentional classification of what was negligence is the most common prosecutorial excess: an uncontrolled agricultural burn is negligence under Article 358, not arson.

Why it is different

10-20 yrs
Fire endangering life or physical integrity (Art. 351 CP).
1-5 yrs
Forest fires; three to six years with danger to persons (Arts. 352-353).
Jury
Fire offences are tried by the Jury Court (LO 5/1995): a different style of litigation.

The fire is proven with science

Fire has its own title in the Criminal Code: the blaze that endangers lives, punished with ten to twenty years; forest fires that raze hillsides; and burning one’s own property to defraud the insurer. These are cases of heavy expert load, where origin, causation and intent are demonstrated, not intuited, and they are tried before the Jury Court, which demands maximum expert clarity before nine citizens.

The defence attacks where the offences actually turn: the concrete danger to persons, without which Article 351 collapses into criminal damage under Article 266; the border between intent and negligence, because agricultural burns and carelessness are not arson; and the attenuation for voluntary extinction and reparation. We defend with fire engineering, not only with law.

The framework

Articles 351 to 358, piece by piece

Art. 351 CP

Fire endangering persons

Causing a fire that entails danger to life or physical integrity: ten to twenty years, according to the entity of the danger. Without personal danger, the facts redirect to damage under Article 266. The danger must be real and concrete: inhabited dwellings, times of day, proximity of people. It is the frontier separating three-year from fifteen-year convictions.
Arts. 352 and 353 CP

Forest fires

Setting fire to woodland: one to five years and a fine; with danger to persons, Article 351 applies. Article 353 aggravates (three to six years) for considerable surface, serious erosive effects, significant alteration of animal or plant life, damage to protected areas or proximity to population.
Art. 354 CP

Forest attempt

Setting fire without propagation: six months to one year, with exemption where propagation is prevented by the author’s voluntary and positive action. The rewarded desistance, best evidenced immediately.
Art. 356 CP

Fires in non-forest vegetation

Fires in non-forest vegetation zones with serious harm to the natural environment: six months to two years.
Art. 357 CP

Burning one’s own property

Burning what is yours is an offence, with one to four years, where there is a purpose to defraud or harm third parties, danger to persons or serious environmental deterioration: the insurance-fraud offence, where the accounting expert accompanies the fire expert.
Art. 358 CP

Fire by gross negligence

The negligent fire carries the penalty one degree lower: uncontrolled agricultural burns, cigarette ends, barbecues. The intentional classification of what was negligence is the most common prosecutorial excess, fought with expert reconstruction.
Art. 358 bis CP

Common provisions

It extends to this title the environmental provisions on reparation and confiscation: voluntary reparation weighs, as in environmental offences.
Jury Court

A different kind of trial

The fire offences of Articles 351 to 358 fall to the Jury Court (LO 5/1995): a preliminary hearing, nine citizens deciding, and a litigation style demanding maximum expert clarity.
Expert evidence

Origin and cause

Accelerants, multiple seats of fire and chronologies are neither invented nor hidden. The origin-and-cause report decides these cases in both directions: it convicts the intentional and exonerates the fortuitous.
Penalties at a glance

Penalty framework by conduct

ConductArticlePenalty frameworkKey factor
Fire endangering persons35110 – 20 yearsReal and concrete danger; without it, damage
Forest fire3521 – 5 years + fineWith danger to persons, Art. 351
Aggravated forest fire3533 – 6 yearsSurface, erosion, protected areas, proximity
Attempt without propagation3546 months – 1 yearExemption for voluntary prevention
Non-forest vegetation3566 months – 2 yearsSerious harm to the environment
Own property3571 – 4 yearsPurpose to defraud the insurer
Gross negligence358One degree lowerBurns, cigarette ends, barbecues
Reparation358 bisAttenuationVoluntary extinction and repair weigh

Penalty ranges are indicative and set out the ordinary framework; the sentence actually imposed depends on the circumstances of each case.

How we defend

Fire engineering at the service of the defence

The origin-and-cause expert report decides these cases: electrical, accidental or intentional is demonstrated with the point of origin, the propagation pattern, the presence or absence of accelerants and the chronology. The attack on the concrete danger to persons is the second front: without inhabited dwellings, real schedules and actual proximity, Article 351 crumbles into damage. And the intent-negligence border is the third: permits, weather conditions, measures adopted and the exact point of origin reconstruct what the accusation classifies as arson.

Before the Jury Court, the litigation style changes: nine citizens decide, and expert clarity outweighs rhetorical sophistication. In insurance cases, the financial analysis accompanies the fire science: where the blaze was fortuitous, the same science demonstrates it.

01

Fire-origin expertise

02

Financial analysis

03

Case-law analytics

04

Jury litigation

How we intervene

A strategy sustained through every phase

Phase 01

Preservation of the scene and first reports

Phase 02

Origin-and-cause counter-expertise

Phase 03

Classification: intent versus negligence

Phase 04

Jury trial and appeals

Who we represent

Each profile demands a distinct defence

A

Farmers and rural owners

Burns that got out of control: the negligence classification that separates months from years.

E

Business owners

Owners of burned premises under insurer suspicion: origin science and financial analysis on both fronts.

I

Persons accused of arson

Those facing Article 351 or 352 charges: the concrete danger and the expert reconstruction as the core defence.

V

Victims and insurers

Those harmed by fires: private prosecution, causation and full recovery.

FAQ

What to know before the first consultation

I am accused over a fire that began in my agricultural burn. Is that the same as being an arsonist?
No: the authorised or negligent burn that gets out of control is negligence under Article 358 (penalty one degree lower), not the intentional fire of Article 352. The difference is years of prison and the stigma. The defence reconstructs permits, weather conditions, measures adopted and the exact point of origin: fire science decides.
Why does my fire case go to the Jury Court?
The fire offences of Articles 351 to 358 fall to the jury (LO 5/1995). That means a preliminary hearing, nine citizens deciding and a different litigation style: maximum expert clarity. We know that terrain and prepare the case for it.
The insurer suspects I burned my warehouse. What is at stake?
If a purpose to defraud is proven: Article 357 (one to four years) plus attempted or completed fraud against the insurer and the loss of the indemnity. These cases are decided with origin-of-fire expertise and financial analysis. If the fire was fortuitous, the same science demonstrates it: accelerants, multiple seats and chronologies are neither invented nor hidden.
Nobody was hurt. Why am I charged under Article 351?
Article 351 punishes the danger, not the result: it is enough that the fire entailed a real and concrete risk to life or integrity. That is precisely the defence ground: without inhabited dwellings, actual schedules and real proximity of persons, the concrete danger fails and the facts redirect to damage.
I set a fire but put it out myself before it spread. Does that count?
Decisively. Article 354.2 exempts from penalty where propagation is prevented by the author’s voluntary and positive action. That rewarded desistance should be evidenced immediately: means used, timing and witnesses.
What does voluntary reparation achieve?
Article 358 bis extends to fire offences the environmental provisions on reparation: repairing the damage voluntarily weighs on the penalty, alongside extinction efforts. Documented early action is the most useful thing after the fact.

Speak to a criminal lawyer

In a fast-track case, the days you have are the case.

Criminal defence in English before the courts of Alicante and the rest of Spain, for residents and for visitors who have flown home.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
Londres: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, Reino Unido
París: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, Francia
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert es un despacho de abogados con sedes en Madrid, Alicante, Londres y París, especializado en defensa y acusación penal, delitos económicos y corporativos y derecho tecnológico. Trabajamos con orientación estratégica en procedimientos penales complejos, propiedad intelectual y análisis forense avanzado, y prestamos consultoría jurídica, compliance y escudos de protección a particulares y empresas. Atendemos desde Alicante y Madrid, con consulta online en toda España y asistencia al detenido 24 horas. Resuelva sus dudas en las preguntas frecuentes o solicite una primera consulta.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h