Art. 5 CP
Principle of culpability
No penalty without intent or negligence: strict liability is excluded.
info@societejuridique.com
Madrid: Paseo de la Castellana 216 8 ª Planta
Alicante: Av. Ansaldo Nº31, local 16
24h emergencies: 669 30 21 13
Theory of crime · Articles 5, 10-14 CP · Throughout Spain
Criminal intent and negligence
Wilful or merely careless? On this distinction hinge the qualification — and sometimes impunity.
There is no penalty without intent or negligence (Art. 5 of the Spanish Criminal Code). Distinguishing intent (direct or eventual) from mere negligence (gross or less serious), and taking account of mistake (Art. 14), is decisive: negligence is punished only where the law expressly provides.
In brief. the principle of culpability (Art. 5 CP) requires intent or negligence. Intent may be direct or eventual; negligence, gross or less serious, is punishable only in the cases expressly provided (Art. 12). Mistake as to an element of the type or as to unlawfulness (Art. 14) excludes or mitigates liability. This distinction commands the qualification and the sentence.
Key facts
5
Principle of culpability: no penalty without intent or negligence.
14
Mistake of type or of prohibition: exclusion or mitigation of liability.
24h
English-speaking lawyer, defence on the subjective element throughout Spain.
To will or to neglect
Intent requires knowledge and will. The perpetrator acts knowing the elements of the type and willing the result (direct intent) or accepting it as probable (eventual intent). The absence of this subjective element excludes the intentional offence.
Negligence is the exception. Under Article 12, commission by negligence is punishable only where the law expressly provides (homicide, injuries, etc.), with a sentence markedly lower than the intentional form.
Mistake alters liability. An invincible mistake as to an element of the type excludes intent (Art. 14.1); an invincible mistake as to unlawfulness excludes liability (Art. 14.3); a vincible mistake mitigates the sentence.
What we argue
The subjective element of the offence
Art. 10 CP
Definition of offence
Offences are intentional or negligent acts and omissions provided by law.
Direct intent
Direct intent
Knowledge of the elements of the type and will to bring about the result.
Eventual intent
Eventual intent
Accepting the result as probable: the border with conscious negligence.
Art. 12 CP
Gross negligence
Serious breach of the duty of care: punishable in the cases provided.
Art. 12 CP
Less serious negligence
Lower-intensity carelessness: punishable in certain offences.
Art. 14.1 CP
Mistake of type
Mistake as to an element: excludes intent; negligence if vincible.
Art. 14.3 CP
Mistake of prohibition
Mistake as to unlawfulness: excludes liability if invincible, mitigates if vincible.
Art. 11 CP
Objective imputation
The result must be objectively attributable to the perpetrator’s conduct.
Effects
Overview of the subjective element
| Concept | Article | Effect | Key point |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct intent | — | Intentional offence | Will of the result |
| Eventual intent | — | Intentional offence | Acceptance of the risk |
| Gross negligence | 12 | Reduced sentence | Cases provided by law |
| Less serious negligence | 12 | Reduced sentence | Lower intensity |
| Fortuitous event | 5 | Impunity | Neither intent nor negligence |
| Invincible mistake of type | 14.1 | Excludes intent | Impunity if not punished as negligence |
| Vincible mistake of type | 14.1 | Negligence sentence | If provided by law |
| Mistake of prohibition | 14.3 | Exclusion or mitigation | By its vincible nature |
Indicative elements based on the Spanish Criminal Code. The qualification depends on proof of the subjective element. This overview does not replace a lawyer’s analysis.
Our difference
Eventual intent or negligence: the decisive border
The subjective qualification changes the sentence — or excludes it. Requalifying eventual intent as negligence, or establishing a fortuitous event, can collapse the sentence or lead to acquittal where negligence is not criminalised.
We argue the absence of intent and mistake. Reconstructing what the perpetrator actually knew and willed, and establishing a mistake as to an element of the type or as to unlawfulness, is often the decisive line of defence.
01
Distinguishing eventual intent from conscious negligence
02
Establishing the absence of the subjective element
03
Invoking mistake of type or of prohibition
04
Challenging the objective imputation of the result
How we act
A structured defence at every stage
Phase 01
Analysis of what the perpetrator knew and willed
Phase 02
Investigation and proof of the subjective element
Phase 03
Plea on intent, negligence or mistake
Phase 04
Qualification and sentence individualisation
Who we represent
Very different situations
D
People under investigation
Accused persons whose real intent is disputed against mere negligence.
P
Professionals
Practitioners and directors prosecuted for negligence in their activity.
A
People involved in accidents
People involved in an unintended harmful event.
F
Families
Relatives seeking to understand the difference between intent and negligence.
Related
Related pages
FAQ
What you should know
Is intent required to be convicted?
In principle yes: Article 5 requires intent or negligence. Objective liability without fault is excluded.
What is eventual intent?
Accepting the result as probable without directly seeking it. Distinguishing it from conscious negligence is often decisive.
Is negligence always punished?
No. Under Article 12, it is punishable only in the cases expressly provided (homicide, injuries, etc.), with a reduced sentence.
What is a mistake of type?
A mistake as to an element of the offence (Art. 14.1): invincible, it excludes intent; vincible, it may leave negligence subsisting.
And a mistake of prohibition?
A mistake as to the unlawfulness of the act (Art. 14.3): invincible, it excludes liability; vincible, it mitigates it.
Why is this decisive?
Because the subjective qualification can exclude the sentence. The firm assists 24/7 in Spain.
Speak to a criminal lawyer
In a fast-track case, the days you have are the case.
Criminal defence in English before the courts of Alicante and the rest of Spain, for residents and for visitors who have flown home.
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
Londres: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, Reino Unido
París: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, Francia
info@societejuridique.com
SERVICIOS
ENLACES
Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert es un despacho de abogados con sedes en Madrid, Alicante, Londres y París, especializado en defensa y acusación penal, delitos económicos y corporativos y derecho tecnológico. Trabajamos con orientación estratégica en procedimientos penales complejos, propiedad intelectual y análisis forense avanzado, y prestamos consultoría jurídica, compliance y escudos de protección a particulares y empresas. Atendemos desde Alicante y Madrid, con consulta online en toda España y asistencia al detenido 24 horas. Resuelva sus dudas en las preguntas frecuentes o solicite una primera consulta.
Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.
Sedes y delegaciones: Alicante·El Campello·Madrid
Tambien actuamos en: San Juan de Alicante·Benidorm·Elche·Torrevieja·Orihuela·Alcoy·San Vicente·Elda·Denia·Villajoyosa·Villena·Novelda·Ibi·Murcia
Tambien actuamos en: San Juan de Alicante·Benidorm·Elche·Torrevieja·Orihuela·Alcoy·San Vicente·Elda·Denia·Villajoyosa·Villena·Novelda·Ibi·Murcia
Defensa por delitos: Alcoholemias·Robos y hurtos·Lesiones·Agresión sexual·Amenazas·Okupas·Homicidios·Antecedentes penales