Hate crimes · Article 510 CP

Hate crimes: defence and prosecution

Criminal defence throughout Spain · offices in Madrid and Alicante

Article 510 punishes fostering, promoting or inciting hatred, hostility, discrimination or violence against a group or a person on statutorily defined grounds. It is an offence of open concepts: interpretation decides the outcome.

In brief. Speech is not judged in isolation: it is judged in its context. Freedom of expression protects ideas that offend, disturb or upset; the offence requires real capacity to incite hatred, hostility, discrimination or violence, or an effective injury to the dignity of the group. A message taken out of context and read years later almost always looks worse than it was.

Why it is different

510
An offence of open concepts: interpretation decides the result.
2
Offices in Madrid and Alicante; assistance anywhere in Spain.
LIWARD
Our own methodology of legal intelligence and forensic analysis.

Speech is not judged in isolation: it is judged in context

The hate-crime provision punishes fostering, promoting or inciting hatred, hostility, discrimination or violence against a group or a person on racist, antisemitic, ideological, religious grounds, or by reason of national or ethnic origin, sexual orientation or identity, gender, family situation, illness or disability. It further punishes the production and dissemination of materials apt for that purpose, the denial or gross trivialisation of genocide and crimes against humanity, and humiliation or contempt injuring the dignity of those groups.

The boundary with freedom of expression lies in the real capacity of the conduct to incite discrimination, hostility or violence, and in the creation of an effective danger for the dignity of a group. The defence is therefore built on the full context: who said it, before whom, in what circumstances, with what actual reach, with what intention and at what moment.

The framework

The offences of Article 510 and related provisions

Art. 510.1 CP

Incitement to hatred and violence

Fostering, promoting or inciting, directly or indirectly, hatred, hostility, discrimination or violence against a group or a person on the statutorily defined grounds. Penalty: imprisonment of one to four years and a fine.
Art. 510.1 b) and c) CP

Materials and denialism

Producing, preparing, possessing for distribution or disseminating materials apt to incite, and denying or grossly trivialising crimes of genocide or against humanity. Penalty: imprisonment of one to four years and a fine.
Art. 510.2 CP

Humiliation and contempt

Acts injuring dignity through humiliation, contempt or discredit of a group, and glorification or justification of offences committed against its members. Penalty: imprisonment of six months to two years and a fine.
Art. 510.3 CP

Dissemination on the internet and social media

Where the facts are disseminated through media, the internet or information technologies reaching a large number of people. Effect: the penalty in its upper half.
Art. 510.4 CP

Disturbance of public peace

An aggravated form where the facts are apt to disturb public peace or to create a serious feeling of insecurity in the affected group. Effect: the penalty one degree higher.
Art. 22.4 CP

The discrimination aggravating circumstance

A circumstance that raises the penalty of any ordinary offence, injuries, threats, damage, where the perpetrator’s discriminatory motive is proven. Effect: it aggravates the penalty of the base offence.
Art. 578 CP

Glorification and humiliation of victims

Glorification or justification of terrorism and acts of discredit, contempt or humiliation of its victims or their relatives. An especially narrow margin. Penalty: imprisonment of one to three years and a fine.
Arts. 511, 512 and 314 CP

Discrimination in services and employment

Denial of a benefit to which a person is entitled on discriminatory grounds, in public service, professional or business activity and in employment. Penalty: imprisonment, fine and disqualification.
Arts. 515.4 and 510 bis CP

Associations and legal persons

Associations that foster, promote or incite hatred, and corporate criminal liability where the speech is channelled through the entity’s structure. Penalty: fine and the penalties of Article 33.7.
Penalties at a glance

Penalty framework by conduct

Conduct Article Penalty framework Deciding factor
Incitement to hatred 510.1 1 – 4 years and fine Real capacity to incite
Humiliation and contempt 510.2 6 months – 2 years and fine Effective injury to dignity
Public or internet dissemination 510.3 Penalty in its upper half Number of recipients reached
Risk to public peace 510.4 Penalty one degree higher Feeling of insecurity in the group
Professional disqualification 510.5 Special disqualification Teaching, sport or leisure sphere
Glorification of terrorism 578 1 – 3 years and fine Internet dissemination: upper half
Discrimination aggravation 22.4 Aggravates the ordinary offence Proof of the discriminatory motive
Legal person 510 bis · 31 bis Fine · Article 33.7 penalties Absence of a compliance programme

Penalty ranges are indicative and set out the ordinary framework; the sentence actually imposed depends on the circumstances of each case.

Our differentiator

Where speech meets forensic analysis

In hate crimes the evidence is almost always documentary and digital: screenshots, publications recovered years later, videos of a chant, recordings of a rally, decontextualised conversation threads. That evidence must be authenticated, dated and placed in context before a court can weigh it, and its technical challenge, authorship of the account, integrity of the capture, real reach of the publication, is often the decisive defence. We apply LIWARD, Legal Intelligence Warfare for Defense, our own methodology integrating legal intelligence, case-law analytics and e-forensics into a single procedural strategy.

01

Legal intelligence

02

Case-law analytics

03

Digital evidence · e-forensic

04

Procedural strategy

How we intervene

A strategy sustained through every phase

Phase 01

Preservation and authentication of the content

Phase 02

Context reconstruction

Phase 03

Freedom-of-expression analysis

Phase 04

Trial and appeals

Who we represent

Each profile demands a distinct defence

I

Persons under investigation

Those investigated over publications, chants or statements: authentication, context and the boundary with freedom of expression.

V

Victims and groups

Persons and collectives targeted by hate speech or discrimination: preservation of evidence, identification of anonymous profiles and private prosecution.

E

Entities and platforms

Associations, clubs and media facing liability for third-party content: prevention programmes and defence of the entity.

P

Public figures

Politicians, creators and communicators whose past publications are reported: context, intent and proportionality of removal measures.

FAQ

What to know before the first consultation

It is a message from years ago. Can it be prosecuted now?
It happens constantly: old publications recovered and reported much later. The passage of time does not erase the offence while it is not time-barred, but it is highly relevant to context: a message written at a specific moment and in a specific atmosphere is later read cold and almost always looks worse than it was. Reconstructing that context is an essential part of the defence.
I incited nothing, I only gave my opinion. Is that an offence?
That is exactly the terrain of the defence. Freedom of expression protects ideas that offend, disturb or upset. The offence requires a real capacity to incite hatred, hostility, discrimination or violence, or an effective injury to the group’s dignity: it is not enough for the message to be unpleasant, rude, hurtful or profoundly mistaken.
I am insulted or threatened because of my origin or my orientation. What do I do?
First, always: preserve the evidence before it is deleted, by notarial certificate, timestamping or forensic certification. Then, a complaint and a request for a judicial order to the platform to identify the holder of the anonymous profile. Without that double step, the proceedings are left without an object.
Can a discriminatory motive aggravate another offence?
Yes. Article 22.4 of the Criminal Code applies the discrimination aggravating circumstance to any ordinary offence, injuries, threats, damage, coercion, where it is proven that the perpetrator acted on racist, antisemitic, ideological, religious grounds, or by reason of orientation or identity, gender, aporophobia, illness or disability. It requires proof of the motive, not merely the victim’s condition.
Can my publication be ordered removed or the website blocked?
Yes. Article 510 itself provides for the destruction, deletion or disabling of the media carrying the offence and the removal of the content, and for blocking access where a portal disseminates that material exclusively or predominantly. These measures are open to challenge on proportionality and scope, and it is advisable to do so from the first moment.
What is the LIWARD methodology?
It is our own methodology, Legal Intelligence Warfare for Defense, which integrates legal intelligence, case-law analytics and digital forensic evidence into a single procedural strategy. It allows us to anticipate the weaknesses of the opposing case and to build on technical evidence.

Speak to a criminal lawyer

In a fast-track case, the days you have are the case.

Criminal defence in English before the courts of Alicante and the rest of Spain, for residents and for visitors who have flown home.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
London: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, United Kingdom
Paris: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, France
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert is a law firm with offices in Madrid, Alicante, London and Paris, specialising in criminal law, technology law and economic and corporate crime. We provide strategic guidance in complex criminal proceedings, intellectual property and technological resources for legal decision-making with advanced forensic analysis. Our multidisciplinary team combines legal experience, legal intelligence and personal attention to deliver effective solutions adapted to each case. Legal assistance available 24 hours a day and online consultations.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h