info@societejuridique.com
Madrid: Paseo de la Castellana 216 8 ª Planta
Alicante: Av. Ansaldo Nº31, local 16
24h emergencies: 669 30 21 13

Social media:

Sextortion · non-consensual dissemination

Sextortion: the guilt that paralyses and the clock that runs

Criminal defence throughout Spain · 24-hour assistance · offices in Madrid and Alicante

Almost everyone who calls us about a sextortion case begins by apologising. Having a sexual conversation with an adult is not an offence. The offence is committed by whoever threatens, whoever demands money and whoever disseminates.

In brief. Article 197.7 punishes precisely the person who disseminates images obtained with the affected person’s consent: the initial consent does not weaken the complaint, it is an element of the offence. The problem is that shame costs days, and days cost evidence: accounts vanish, ephemeral messages disappear and connection data are only accessible for a limited time and with judicial authorisation.

Why it is different

24h
The window in which much of the evidence is decided: full captures, account identifiers and payment traces.
12 months
General retention period of traffic data by operators (Law 25/2007), accessible only with judicial authorisation.
197.7
Disseminating intimate images obtained with consent: three months to one year of imprisonment or a fine, in the upper half with an ex-partner, a minor or a profit motive.

The guilt that paralyses and the clock that runs

Almost everyone who calls us about sextortion begins the conversation by apologising: they were naive, they should not have replied to that profile, their partner will not understand. Let it be said clearly from the start: having a sexual conversation with an adult is not an offence, and neither is sending images of oneself. The offence is committed by whoever threatens, whoever demands money and whoever disseminates. That distinction is not emotional comfort; it is the technical basis of the case. Article 197.7 punishes precisely the person who disseminates images obtained with the affected person’s consent. Saying “I sent them myself” confesses nothing: it describes the factual situation the law itself contemplates.

The problem is that shame costs days, and days cost evidence. While the person decides whether to tell anyone, three things happen at once: the blackmailer deletes the account, the ephemeral messages and video calls disappear from the device, and the connection data that would allow someone to be located are retained only for a limited time and are accessible only through a judicial order. The first twenty-four hours decide much of the case.

The framework

The offences that concur in a sextortion

Art. 171.2 CP

Blackmail with revealing private life

The most frequent scenario: money demanded under the threat of disseminating sexual images or conversations. The threatened harm need not itself be criminal; facts of private life not publicly known, capable of harming reputation or credit, suffice. The penalty rises if the blackmailer collected.
Art. 169 CP

Conditional threats of criminal harm

Where what is announced is itself an offence (disseminating the images, attacking, damaging) conditioned on payment. Threats aimed at obtaining more sexual material instead of money, an increasingly common form, also sit here.
Art. 243 CP

Extortion

Where intimidation forces the victim to perform an act or legal transaction to the detriment of their assets (signing, transferring, taking out a fast loan to pay), the facts can be classified as extortion, with a markedly higher penalty range.
Art. 197.7 CP

Dissemination of images obtained with consent

Non-consensual dissemination of sexting: punishing whoever discloses without authorisation images sent to them or recorded with the person’s consent in a private setting, where dissemination seriously harms their privacy. Upper half where the author is a spouse or ex-partner, the victim a minor or protected disabled person, or there is a profit motive.
Art. 197.1 CP

Seizure of messages and images

Where the material was not handed over voluntarily but obtained by opening another’s phone, copying the gallery, intercepting messages or recording covertly: discovery of secrets, with higher penalties than 197.7.
Art. 197 bis CP

Unlawful access to accounts and devices

Entering another person’s mail, cloud or social profile in breach of security measures, even without copying anything. Common in break-ups where one party keeps the passwords or an open session on a shared tablet.
Arts. 197.3 and 197.5 CP

Disclosure of unlawfully obtained intimate data

Disseminating to third parties what was obtained through that access or seizure is punished in aggravated form, in the upper half where the data concern sexual life or the victim is a minor or protected disabled person.
Art. 189 CP

Victim under age

Where the person blackmailed or depicted is a minor, the material can constitute child sexual abuse material and the case changes scale: investigation is ex officio and the penalties are far higher. Whoever merely possesses or redistributes that material also answers.
Art. 183 ter CP

Online deception of minors

Contacting a child under sixteen by technological means to arrange a meeting for sexual purposes, or deceiving them into sending pornographic material, has its own offence. It is the usual gateway to sextortion of minors.
Procedure

From the complaint to the trial: what happens and when

QuestionRuleWhat it meansThe key point
Who may complainArt. 201 CPSemi-public offences: the victim’s complaint is requiredThe prosecutor may complain for minors; no complaint needed where general interests or many victims are affected
PardonArt. 201.3 CPThe victim’s pardon extinguishes the criminal actionA decision to take with advice, never under pressure
Ex officio offencesArts. 169, 243, 189 CPThreats, extortion and offences against minors need no complaintThe case continues regardless of the victim’s wishes
WhereDuty court or specialised unitsTelematic crime units support the investigationGo with the complaint drafted and the evidence indexed
InterpretersArt. 123 LECrimRight to interpretation and translation of the essentialsExercise it from the first moment
Parallel measuresAEPD priority channelUrgent removal of non-consensual sexual contentRemoval requests to platforms and de-indexing from search engines
Traffic dataLaw 25/2007Twelve months of retention, judicial authorisation requiredThe clock that makes early reporting decisive
Foreign authorsArt. 641.2 LECrimProvisional dismissal is frequent, reopening possibleComplaints accumulate across victims of the same network and support removals

This overview is indicative; the applicable route depends on the offence, the victim’s age and the specific circumstances of each case.

The first 24 hours

Preserving the evidence without destroying it

The natural reflex of whoever receives a threat is to delete: the conversation, the contact, the app, the account. It is understandable and it is the most expensive error, because it destroys in two minutes the only thing that would later allow an investigation. Do not block yet: blocking the blackmailer before documenting the thread can remove the profile from view; document first, block afterwards. Capture the entire conversation, not just the harshest fragments, showing the username, the exact identifier, the profile picture and the date marks. Note the identifiers in a separate document: e-mail address, telephone number with international prefix, full profile link, account number or wallet address, reference of every transfer. Those data are what the court turns into orders.

Do not format, do not factory-reset and do not change phones: the device where it all happened is a source of evidence, and changing terminals to start afresh is emotionally understandable and evidentially ruinous. Keep a copy outside the phone. And do not investigate on your own: accessing the blackmailer’s account or your ex-partner’s phone can itself be an offence and can compromise the validity of everything obtained from it. On unlawful evidence and its contagion, the reference doctrine is STC 81/1998 (ECLI:ES:TC:1998:81) on the connection of unlawfulness; on evidence of foreign origin, STS 904/2023 (ECLI:ES:TS:2023:5215); and on investigation time limits, STS 747/2024 (ECLI:ES:TS:2024:4260). References must be verified at source; this page does not constitute legal advice.

01

Legal intelligence

02

Case-law analytics

03

Digital evidence · e-forensic

04

Procedural strategy

How we intervene

A strategy sustained through every phase

Phase 01

First 24 hours: preservation

Phase 02

Complaint with indexed evidence

Phase 03

Removal, tracing and orders

Phase 04

Trial, protection and compensation

Who we represent

Each profile demands a distinct defence

V

Blackmailed adults

Victims of sextortion by strangers or ex-partners: preservation, complaint, removal of content and recovery of payments where traceable.

F

Families of minors

Parents of blackmailed minors: ex officio investigation, specialised units and protection of the child throughout the proceedings.

I

Persons under investigation

Those accused of dissemination or threats: authorship of the accounts, authenticity of the captures and the correct classification.

E

Foreign residents

Non-Spanish speakers on either side: interpreters, translated essentials and complaints prepared before attending the station.

FAQ

What to know before the first consultation

I sent the photos voluntarily. Can I still complain?
Yes. Article 197.7 is designed exactly for that situation: it punishes whoever disseminates without authorisation images obtained with the affected person’s consent. Consent to record or to send is not consent to disseminate. Your voluntary participation does not weaken your position; it is part of the offence.
They are demanding money tonight. Do I pay to buy time?
We do not recommend it. The first payment confirms to the blackmailer that you respond and usually opens a sequence of demands. Moreover, whoever collects does not always control the dissemination. If you have already paid, do not hide it: the traceability of the money is frequently the best investigative route, and having obtained the payment aggravates the author’s penalty under both Article 169 and Article 171.2.
Can I delete the conversation after taking screenshots?
No. Captures are a support, not a substitute. The original thread on the device holds metadata and account information an image does not preserve, and if the defence challenges authenticity it is the only thing that proves it. Document, export, keep a copy off the phone and delete or format nothing until a lawyer or the police unit tells you to.
The blackmailer is in another country. Is complaining any use?
It is, though realism is needed. Where the author operates from outside the EU with false profiles, identification is difficult and many proceedings end in provisional dismissal under Article 641.2 LECrim. Complaining leaves a record, allows your information to be pooled with that of other victims of the same network, supports removal requests and keeps reopening possible.
My fifteen-year-old sent images of himself. Can he be in trouble?
The minor who records themselves and sends the image is a victim, not a perpetrator. Problems arise when another minor receives that material and redistributes it, conduct that can have consequences under juvenile criminal law. As an adult, do not forward the material to anyone, not even to ask advice, and preserve the device as it is.
Can what is already published be taken down?
It can be requested and is frequently achieved on the large platforms, which have specific procedures for non-consensual sexual content. The Spanish Data Protection Agency operates a priority channel for urgent removal, and de-indexing from search engines is also possible. What nobody can guarantee is the definitive disappearance of the material, because copies already downloaded escape any order.
If I complain, will anyone have to see the images?
The material joins the case file and is examined by those professionally involved. It is not shown in open court as a matter of routine: the court can order a closed hearing and prohibit disclosure of the victim’s identity under Article 681 LECrim, and the Victim’s Statute provides protection measures adapted to each case. These measures are requested expressly from the first filing.
I am a foreigner and do not speak Spanish. How do I complain in Alicante?
You are entitled to an interpreter and to translation of the essential information, whether as victim or as the person under investigation. Complaining does not affect your administrative situation or residence. We prepare the complaint and the evidence index before going to the station or the court, so that your account does not depend on an improvised translation.

Speak to a criminal lawyer

In a fast-track case, the days you have are the case.

Criminal defence in English before the courts of Alicante and the rest of Spain, for residents and for visitors who have flown home.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
Londres: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, Reino Unido
París: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, Francia
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert es un despacho de abogados con sedes en Madrid, Alicante, Londres y París, especializado en defensa y acusación penal, delitos económicos y corporativos y derecho tecnológico. Trabajamos con orientación estratégica en procedimientos penales complejos, propiedad intelectual y análisis forense avanzado, y prestamos consultoría jurídica, compliance y escudos de protección a particulares y empresas. Atendemos desde Alicante y Madrid, con consulta online en toda España y asistencia al detenido 24 horas. Resuelva sus dudas en las preguntas frecuentes o solicite una primera consulta.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h