Article 573 defines a terrorism offence as the commission of any serious offence against the interests which it lists where it is carried out with one of four purposes, among them subverting the constitutional order, seriously disturbing public peace or provoking a state of terror in the population.
1. A terrorism offence shall be taken to be the commission of any serious offence against life or physical integrity, liberty, moral integrity, sexual freedom and integrity, property, natural resources or the environment, public health, of catastrophic risk, arson, of documentary forgery, against the Crown, of assault and of the possession, trafficking and storage of weapons, ammunition or explosives, provided for in this Code, and the seizure of aircraft, vessels or other means of collective transport or of goods, where they are carried out with any of the following purposes:
1. To subvert the constitutional order, or to suppress or seriously destabilise the functioning of the political institutions or of the economic or social structures of the State, or to compel the public authorities to perform an act or to refrain from doing so.
2. To disturb public peace seriously.
3. To destabilise seriously the functioning of an international organisation.
4. To provoke a state of terror in the population or in a part of it.
2. The computer offences defined in Articles 197 bis and 197 ter and 264 to 264 quater shall likewise be taken to be terrorism offences where the acts are committed with one of the purposes referred to in the preceding paragraph.
3. Likewise, the remaining offences defined in this Chapter shall be regarded as terrorism offences.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Absence of the terrorist purpose. The whole definition rests upon the purpose pursued. Establishing that the conduct responded to a personal, economic or ideological motive without any of the four purposes listed removes the terrorist classification and returns the case to the ordinary frames and to the ordinary courts.
Seriousness of the underlying offence. Paragraph 1 is confined to serious offences. Where the underlying offence is a less serious one, the definition does not apply, which has immediate consequences for jurisdiction and for the applicable procedure.
Jurisdiction of the National Court. The classification determines the jurisdiction of the National Court. Contesting it at the outset, by way of the declinatory of jurisdiction, affects not only the penalty but the whole procedural framework and the enforcement regime.
Individualisation of the contribution. Where the accused is charged as part of a group, the contribution of each person must be established separately. Establishing the absence of any knowledge of the purpose pursued by others excludes the terrorist classification in respect of that accused.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.