Article 666 Spanish Criminal Procedure Act: Preliminary objections

Article 666 lists exhaustively the questions which may be raised as preliminary objections before the trial hearing: declinatory of jurisdiction, res judicata, limitation of the offence, amnesty or pardon, and the absence of the administrative authorisation required to prosecute.

Also cited as: article 666 Spanish Criminal Procedure Act · art. 666 LECrim · LECrim article 666 · artículo 666 de la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Criminal.

Wording of Article 666 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act

Only the following questions or objections shall be the object of preliminary objections:

1. The declinatory of jurisdiction.

2. Res judicata.

3. Limitation of the offence.

4. Amnesty or pardon.

5. The absence of administrative authorisation to prosecute in the cases in which it is necessary, in accordance with the Constitution and with special Acts.

Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.

Effect. The provision imposes no penalty. Where the objection is upheld, the effect is the dismissal of the case or the referral of the proceedings to the court having jurisdiction, and a rejection at this stage does not prevent the same question from being raised again at the trial hearing.

Requirements and procedure

  1. That the question raised be one of the five listed in the provision, since the list is exhaustive.
  2. That it be raised within the period for the written statement of defence, in the terms of Articles 667 and following.
  3. That it be dealt with in a separate file, with the intervention of all the parties.
  4. That it be determined by a decision which, where the objection is rejected, does not prevent the question from being raised again at the trial hearing.

Defence strategy

Limitation of the offence. The plea of limitation requires the identification of the penalty frame in the abstract, of the date of commission and of the acts which genuinely interrupted the period. Raising it as a preliminary objection avoids a trial hearing which is unnecessary and, where rejected, preserves the point for the appeal.

Res judicata and identity of the object. The objection requires an identity of act and of person, and not an identity of legal classification. Producing the earlier judgment or order of free dismissal, and establishing the coincidence of the factual account, is the whole of the material upon which the objection rests.

Declinatory of jurisdiction. The plea covers both territorial and objective jurisdiction. Raising it at this stage prevents the consolidation of a defective forum, and the case law is restrictive as to any later challenge where the objection was available and was not raised.

Reiteration at the trial hearing. The rejection of a preliminary objection does not preclude the question. It must be reproduced at the outset of the trial hearing in order to preserve it for the appeal, and the omission of that step is a frequent cause of the loss of the ground.

Defence in this area

If you or your company are facing proceedings in this area, the firm provides defence and prosecution in Alicante and Madrid, with 24-hour assistance to detained persons.

Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.

This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.

Frequently asked questions

What effect does the application of Article 666 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act produce?

The provision imposes no penalty. Where the objection is upheld, the effect is the dismissal of the case or the referral of the proceedings to the court having jurisdiction, and a rejection at this stage does not prevent the same question from being raised again at the trial hearing.

What requirements and procedure does Article 666 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act lay down?

That the question raised be one of the five listed in the provision, since the list is exhaustive. That it be raised within the period for the written statement of defence, in the terms of Articles 667 and following. That it be dealt with in a separate file, with the intervention of all the parties. That it be determined by a decision which, where the objection is rejected, does not prevent the question from being raised again at the trial hearing.

How does the defence make use of Article 666 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act?

Limitation of the offence. The plea of limitation requires the identification of the penalty frame in the abstract, of the date of commission and of the acts which genuinely interrupted the period. Raising it as a preliminary objection avoids a trial hearing which is unnecessary and, where rejected, preserves the point for the appeal. Res judicata and identity of the object. The objection requires an identity of act and of person, and not an identity of legal classification. Producing the earlier judgment or order of free dismissal, and establishing the coincidence of the factual account, is the whole of the material upon which the objection rests. Declinatory of jurisdiction. The plea covers both territorial and objective jurisdiction.

Is the English text of Article 666 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act official?

Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
London: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, United Kingdom
Paris: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, France
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert is a law firm with offices in Madrid, Alicante, London and Paris, specialising in criminal law, technology law and economic and corporate crime. We provide strategic guidance in complex criminal proceedings, intellectual property and technological resources for legal decision-making with advanced forensic analysis. Our multidisciplinary team combines legal experience, legal intelligence and personal attention to deliver effective solutions adapted to each case. Legal assistance available 24 hours a day and online consultations.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h