Article 779 of the Criminal Procedure Act lists the five decisions available to the investigating judge once the preliminary steps have been taken: discontinuance, referral for trial as a minor offence, declining jurisdiction in favour of the military courts or the juvenile prosecutor, continuation as an abbreviated procedure, and, where the accused has admitted the facts before the judge with his lawyer present, immediate conversion into the expedited route of article 801. The fifth of those decisions is the one that resolves a great many cases involving foreign nationals on the same day.
1. Once the appropriate steps have been taken without delay, the judge shall adopt by order one of the following decisions:
1.ª If he considers that the act does not constitute a criminal offence, or that its commission does not appear sufficiently established, he shall order the appropriate discontinuance. If, even considering that the act may constitute an offence, there is no known perpetrator, he shall order provisional discontinuance and direct that the file be closed.
The order of discontinuance shall be communicated to the victims of the offence, at the electronic mail address and, failing that, the postal address or domicile they have designated in the application provided for in article 5.1.m) of the Act on the Statute of the Victim of Crime.
In cases of death or disappearance caused by an offence, the order of discontinuance shall be communicated in the same manner to the persons referred to in the second paragraph of article 109 bis(1), whose identity and electronic or postal address are known.
Exceptionally, in the case of citizens resident outside the European Union, if no electronic or postal address is available at which to make the communication, it shall be sent to the Spanish diplomatic or consular office in the country of residence for publication.
Once five days have elapsed from the communication, it shall be understood to have been validly made and shall produce all its effects. Excepted from this regime are cases in which the victim establishes just cause for the impossibility of accessing the content of the communication.
Victims may appeal against the order of discontinuance within twenty days, even if they have not appeared as a party in the proceedings.
2.ª If he considers the act which gave rise to the proceedings to be a minor offence, he shall direct that the file be sent to the competent judge, where its trial does not fall to him.
3.ª If the act is attributed to the military jurisdiction, he shall decline in favour of the competent body. If all those under investigation are below the age of criminal responsibility, the file shall be transmitted to the Juvenile Prosecutor so that the procedures of the Act on the Criminal Liability of Minors may be commenced.
4.ª If the act constitutes an offence falling within article 757, the procedure laid down in the following chapter shall be followed. That decision, which shall contain the determination of the punishable acts and the identification of the person to whom they are attributed, may not be adopted without having taken that person’s statement in the terms provided for in article 775.
5.ª If, at any earlier moment, the person under investigation, assisted by his lawyer, has admitted the facts before the judge, and those facts constitute an offence punishable by a penalty within the limits provided for in article 801, the judge shall order the immediate summoning of the Public Prosecution Service and of the parties who have appeared, so that they may state whether they will file an indictment with the consent of the accused. If so, he shall commence urgent proceedings and direct that the case continue in accordance with the procedures provided for in articles 800 and 801.
2. In the first three cases, if there is no member of the Public Prosecution Service present at the court, and the parties have not lodged an appeal, the file shall be sent to the Prosecutor of the Provincial Court, who shall, within the three days following its receipt, return it to the court either with the pleading lodging an appeal or with the formula “seen”, whereupon the decision shall be executed.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.
The fifth decision and its timing. Where the evidence is strong and the penalty falls within the limits of article 801, an admission before the judge converts the case into the expedited route and produces a sentence reduced by one third, with the possibility of suspension resolved at the same hearing. For a foreign client this closes the matter without a further journey to Spain. The decision must be taken after reading the file and never before, and it requires the penalty calculation to be verified in advance.
Absence of the statement required for the fourth decision. The order continuing the case as an abbreviated procedure cannot be made without having taken the statement of the person concerned in the terms of article 775. Where that statement was never taken, or was taken without a lawyer or without a proper interpreter, the order is defective and the defect is raised at once, since it affects the whole of the subsequent procedure.
Seeking the appropriate form of discontinuance. The first decision covers both definitive and provisional discontinuance, and the difference matters: only the former produces the effect of an acquittal. Where the material shows that the act is not an offence or that the accused did not participate, the defence asks expressly for definitive discontinuance and opposes a provisional order, which would leave the client exposed for the whole limitation period.
Reclassification as a minor offence. The second decision reduces the exposure to the penalties of a minor offence, ordinarily a fine, and the procedure to a hearing before the duty court. Establishing that the injury falls below the threshold of article 147.1, that the value of the property does not exceed four hundred euros, or that the conduct amounts only to minor coercion or insult, is therefore among the most valuable arguments available at this stage.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.