A message, a gesture, pressure: the line between conflict and offence turns on the words.
Threats, coercion and harassment in Alicante: Articles 169 to 172 of the Spanish Criminal Code punish announcing harm, imposing conduct by force or harassing a person. Context, seriousness and intent are central to an English-speaking defence before the courts of Alicante.
In brief. threats (Arts. 169-171) punish announcing a future harm, whether or not it amounts to an offence, and conditional threats. Coercion (Art. 172) punishes forcibly imposing conduct, and harassment (Art. 172 ter) obsessive stalking. Severity, the seriousness of the announcement and the context determine the qualification, heard in Alicante.
A threat requires a serious announcement. Article 169 targets announcing future harm; its severity depends on whether the harm amounts to an offence, and on its credible and serious nature, assessed in context.
Coercion imposes conduct. Article 172 punishes anyone who, by violence, prevents another from doing what the law does not forbid, or forces them to do what they do not want.
Harassment stands alone. Article 172 ter punishes obsessive tracking — surveillance, insistent contact — that seriously alters the victim’s daily life.
| Offence | Article | Penalty framework | Key aggravating factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threat of an offence | 169 | 6 months – 5 years | Conditional threat |
| Threat to a group | 170 | Aggravated penalty | Collective reach |
| Threat of non-criminal harm | 171 | 3 months – 1 year or fine | Blackmail |
| Threat against a relation | 171.4 | 6 months – 1 year | Family context |
| Coercion | 172 | 6 months – 3 years or fine | Violence used |
| Coercion of a relation | 172.2 | 6 months – 1 year | Presence of minors |
| Harassment (stalking) | 172 ter | 3 months – 2 years | Alteration of daily life |
| Forced marriage | 172 bis | 6 months – 3.5 years | Coercion or deception |
Indicative figures based on the Spanish Criminal Code. The penalty depends on severity, context and seriousness. This table does not replace a lawyer’s analysis.
Context makes the qualification. An expression uttered in anger, without credibility or real intent to intimidate, does not necessarily amount to a punishable threat.
We analyse the digital evidence. Messages, audio and screenshots are placed back in context: tone, reciprocity and chronology often allow the threat or harassment to be ruled out.
People accused of threats or coercion following a conflict.
People threatened or harassed seeking protection and reparation.
Neighbour or business disputes escalating into accusations.
English-speakers facing proceedings for threats in Alicante.
Speak to a criminal lawyer
Criminal defence in English before the courts of Alicante and the rest of Spain, for residents and for visitors who have flown home.