info@societejuridique.com
Madrid: Paseo de la Castellana 216 8 ª Planta
Alicante: Av. Ansaldo Nº31, local 16
24h emergencies: 669 30 21 13

Social media:

Gender violence · specialised courts

Gender violence proceedings: defence and private prosecution

Criminal defence throughout Spain · 24-hour assistance · offices in Madrid and Alicante

When a complaint concerns facts between present or former partners, the case stops behaving like an ordinary criminal matter: a specialised court intervenes, a duty rota operates every day of the year, interim measures can be adopted within hours and the prosecutor acts on criteria of their own.

In brief. Not every gender-violence complaint ends in prison, far from it: a very large share of these cases involve penalties of six months to one year with a community-service alternative. Nor is it a harmless procedure: even a short conviction leaves a record, carries a mandatory restraining order (Art. 57.2 CP, not negotiable even with both parties’ agreement) and can affect a foreigner’s status and contact with the children.

Why it is different

72h
Maximum period for the court to hold the hearing and rule on the protection order from receipt of the application (Art. 544 ter LECrim).
30 days
Initial validity of the civil measures of the protection order (home, custody, visits, maintenance). Without a family-court claim, they lapse.
Always
The restraining penalty of Art. 48.2 CP is imposed in every conviction under Art. 57.2 CP: it is not negotiable, even with the agreement of both parties.

What it means for a case to enter the gender-violence circuit

When a complaint is filed over facts between persons who are or were a couple, the proceedings stop behaving like an ordinary criminal case. A specialised court intervenes, a duty rota operates every day of the year, interim measures can be adopted within hours and the Public Prosecutor acts on its own criteria, independent of what the complainant wants. Two procedural positions exist within the same circuit, and we act in both: for the person under investigation and for the person seeking protection.

Two truths must be stated plainly. Not every case ends in prison: a very wide share of these matters involve offences punished with six months to one year, with a community-service alternative, or even minor offences. And the opposite is equally false: it is not an innocuous procedure. A conviction, however short the penalty, leaves a criminal record, drags a mandatory prohibition of approach, and can affect a foreigner’s administrative situation and the contact arrangements with the children. Whoever arrives at this firm is usually frightened, whichever side of the proceedings they are on, and what they need is to know what will happen on Monday morning.

The framework

The offences that pass through these courts

Arts. 153.1 and 153.3 CP

Physical mistreatment and minor injury within the couple

By far the most frequent offence: minor injury or a simple blow without injury, where the victim is or was a wife or a woman in an analogous relationship, even without cohabitation. Six months to one year of imprisonment or community service, plus a weapons ban; upper half where committed before minors, at the shared home or in breach of a restraining measure.
Art. 171.4 CP

Minor threats

Announcing harm to the partner or ex-partner where the facts do not amount to a serious threat: a phrase in an argument, a late-night message. The same range as Article 153.1, plus the weapons ban. The evidence is usually reduced to screenshots, whose authentication matters.
Art. 172.2 CP

Minor coercion

Preventing the other person by violence from doing something lawful or forcing them to do what they do not want: withholding the phone, blocking a door, preventing someone from leaving a room. The border with unlawful detention and with a mere episode of domestic tension is thin.
Art. 173.2 CP

Habitual violence

It punishes a climate, not a single fact: proof of the habitual exercise of physical or psychological violence, by the number of acts and their proximity in time. Six months to three years and a weapons ban of three to five years, without prejudice to the individual acts. The most evidentially contested offence: it requires far more than an accumulation of complaints.
Art. 173.4 CP

Minor insult or unjust humiliation

A minor offence: insults or humiliations of small entity within the Article 173.2 sphere. Permanent localisation away from the victim, community service or a fine. The only one in this list requiring the victim’s complaint to be prosecuted.
Art. 468.2 CP

Breach of a measure or sentence

The offence that generates the most cases after the first, and the one that most surprises its authors. Breaching a prohibition of approach or communication carries, where the victim is an Article 173.2 person, six months to one year of imprisonment in every case, with no fine alternative. The protected person’s consent is not, by itself, an excluding cause.
Art. 172 ter CP

Stalking

Watching, pursuing, seeking physical proximity, insistent contact or use of personal data, repeatedly and gravely altering daily life. Frequent in recent break-ups, with false profiles and family or friends as indirect channels. Three months to two years or a fine, aggravated where the victim is or was a partner.
Art. 197.7 CP

Dissemination of intimate images

Disclosing without authorisation images obtained with the other person’s consent in a private setting, where disclosure seriously harms their privacy. Three months to one year or a fine, in the upper half where the author is or was a spouse or analogous partner. Sending to a closed group also counts as dissemination.
Art. 148.4 CP

Injuries aggravated by the relationship

Where the injury requires medical or surgical treatment and the victim is or was a wife or analogous partner, the basic offence can be punished with two to five years. The leap from Article 153.1 is enormous and turns on a technical detail: whether the stitches, immobilisation or subsequent care amount to medical treatment in the criminal sense.
Procedure

The real journey, from the 112 call to the judgment

StageWhat happensRuleThe key point
Police interventionThe patrol attends, separates the parties and assesses arrestAtestadoA VioGén risk assessment is made; administrative, but it weighs on the first judicial decision
DetentionRelease or production before the court within 72 hoursArt. 520 LECrimIn local practice, the court appearance usually comes earlier, at the duty rota
Protection orderUrgent hearing and ruling within 72 hoursArt. 544 ter LECrimCriminal block (restraining, no contact, exit from the home) and civil block (home, custody, visits, maintenance)
Civil measuresThirty days of validity544 ter.7They lapse without a family-court claim; many discover the deadline too late
Denial or grantNeither dismissal nor conviction follows automaticallyRisk decisionProvisional material, reviewable if circumstances change
Fast trackAccusation and trial possible the same dayArts. 795-801 LECrimNegotiated judgment with a one-third reduction; nobody can force a corridor decision without the file
TrialSpecialised court; the evidence is examinedLO 1/2004Where evidence is weak or contradictory, trial is the technically correct path
ConvictionRecord, mandatory restraining order, possible suspensionArts. 57.2 and 80 CPThe restraining penalty is imposed in every case and is not negotiable

This route map is indicative and reflects the ordinary practice of the courts of the province; each case depends on its specific facts and circumstances.

What the courts require

What can be achieved and what cannot

We do not promise results; in this field doing so would be especially indecent, because both sides arrive at a bad moment and are easy to persuade. What we can do is state the limits in advance. A complaint cannot be withdrawn: you may state that you do not wish to continue, and that statement is recorded, but the proceedings continue if the prosecutor finds indications; the practical exception is the minor offence of Article 173.4, which requires the victim’s complaint. A restraining order cannot be lifted by mutual agreement: it can be asked of the court, with reasons, and it is sometimes granted, but while there is no ruling the measure is alive and breaching it is an offence. And a conviction cannot be prevented from leaving a record.

What is genuinely litigated: the classification (between a penalty of months and one of years), the existence or not of medical treatment, habituality, the integrity of the digital evidence, the proportionality of the interim measures, the individualisation of the penalty, the suspension of its execution and the civil liability. On the complainant’s side: the real effectiveness of the measures, the compensation claim and the coordination with the family proceedings. Where case-law support is needed in a specific matter (habituality under Article 173.2, the scope of the Article 416 LECrim dispensation, consented breach), it is searched and verified for that matter, with the ruling in sight and its full reference in the pleading. Not before, and not from memory.

01

Legal intelligence

02

Case-law analytics

03

Digital evidence · e-forensic

04

Procedural strategy

How we intervene

A strategy sustained through every phase

Phase 01

Duty rota: detention and protection order

Phase 02

Fast track: negotiated judgment or defence

Phase 03

Evidence: classification and digital material

Phase 04

Trial, suspension and family coordination

Who we represent

Each profile demands a distinct defence

I

Persons under investigation

Detainees and persons summoned before the specialised courts: reading the file before any decision, classification and viable suspension.

V

Persons seeking protection

Victims applying for a protection order: the 72-hour hearing, effective measures and the thirty-day civil deadline.

F

Families with children

Cases where the order affects custody and visits: family-court coordination and handovers through the family meeting point.

E

Foreign residents

Non-nationals on either side: effects of a conviction on the permit, Article 89 substitution and interpreters throughout.

FAQ

What to know before the first consultation

I filed a complaint and now do not want to continue. Can I withdraw it?
Not in the sense usually understood. You may appear and state that you do not wish to continue, and that statement joins the file, but these are public offences and the Public Prosecutor can sustain the accusation even if you do not. With a medical report, a police report and statements, the proceedings normally continue. The exception is the minor offence of insult or unjust humiliation of Article 173.4, prosecuted only upon the victim’s complaint.
Am I obliged to testify against my partner or ex-partner?
Article 416 LECrim grants certain relatives a dispensation from the duty to testify, but that regime has been notably restricted and does not operate in every case. Among other situations, whoever has appeared as private prosecutor cannot invoke it. The decision to appear or not therefore conditions what you will be able to do at trial.
I was arrested and told the trial could be tomorrow. Is that normal?
Yes. If the case proceeds as urgent proceedings, the duty court can formulate the accusation and try the matter the same day, with a one-third reduction if a negotiated judgment is accepted. It is fast and sometimes the best exit, but it demands having read the police report first. You are entitled to refuse and let the case follow its ordinary course. Nobody can force you to decide in a corridor without information.
How long does the protection order take and what exactly does it include?
The court must convene an urgent hearing and rule within a maximum of seventy-two hours from the application. It may include criminal measures (restraining, no contact, exit from the home and, in serious cases, provisional detention) and civil measures (use of the home, custody, visits and maintenance). The civil ones last thirty days and lapse unless the family jurisdiction is then seised.
There is a restraining order. Can I keep seeing my children?
It depends on what the decision says. Restraining with respect to the mother does not automatically suspend contact with the children, but the court frequently rules on that point too and, where contact is kept, orders handovers at a family meeting point to avoid contact between the parents. What must never be done is to use the children as an indirect channel of communication: that can amount to a breach.
We got back together by mutual decision. Is contact still an offence?
Yes, while the measure is in force. The prohibition is imposed by the court, not by the protected person, and her consent is not by itself a cause excluding liability under Article 468.2, which carries six months to one year of imprisonment. If the couple has decided to resume cohabitation, the correct step is to ask the court to review and lift the measure.
I am a foreign resident. Does a conviction affect my permit?
It can. A conviction for an intentional offence to a custodial penalty above one year is a ground of expulsion under immigration law, and Article 89 CP provides for the substitution of certain prison terms by expulsion. Neither is automatic: personal circumstances, ties, family and length of residence are weighed, and opposition is possible. If your administrative situation matters, say so at the first interview, because it changes the whole approach, including the decision on a negotiated judgment.
The complaint is false. Can I report the other party?
The offence of false accusation of Article 456 CP exists, but its requirements are strict and findings are infrequent. It requires the imputation of false facts with knowledge of their falsity or reckless disregard for the truth, and it cannot be pursued until the first proceedings have ended with a final dismissal or acquittal. The realistic priority is winning the current case; the decision on a subsequent action is taken afterwards, with the file in hand.

Speak to a criminal lawyer

In a fast-track case, the days you have are the case.

Criminal defence in English before the courts of Alicante and the rest of Spain, for residents and for visitors who have flown home.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
Londres: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, Reino Unido
París: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, Francia
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert es un despacho de abogados con sedes en Madrid, Alicante, Londres y París, especializado en defensa y acusación penal, delitos económicos y corporativos y derecho tecnológico. Trabajamos con orientación estratégica en procedimientos penales complejos, propiedad intelectual y análisis forense avanzado, y prestamos consultoría jurídica, compliance y escudos de protección a particulares y empresas. Atendemos desde Alicante y Madrid, con consulta online en toda España y asistencia al detenido 24 horas. Resuelva sus dudas en las preguntas frecuentes o solicite una primera consulta.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h