Article 650 confines the written indictment to precise and numbered conclusions as to the punishable acts, their legal classification, the participation of each accused person, the circumstances modifying liability and the penalties incurred, together with the civil claim where it is pursued.
The written indictment shall be confined to determining, in precise and numbered conclusions:
1. The punishable acts which result from the investigation.
2. The legal classification of those same acts, determining the offence which they constitute.
3. The participation which the accused person or persons, if there are several, had in them.
4. The acts resulting from the investigation which constitute mitigating or aggravating circumstances of the offence or grounds excluding criminal liability.
5. The penalties incurred by the accused person or persons, if there are several, by reason of their respective participation in the offence.
The private prosecutor, where applicable, and the public prosecutor where the civil action is pursued, shall in addition state:
1. The amount at which they assess the damage and loss caused by the offence, or the thing which is to be restored.
2. The person or persons who appear to be liable for the damage and loss or for the restitution of the thing, and the fact by virtue of which they have incurred that liability.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.
Insufficiency of the factual account. The account of the acts must be sufficient to permit the defence. An indictment drafted in generic terms, without specification of dates, amounts or individual conduct, is capable of challenge and may be objected to as a defect at the outset of the trial hearing.
The principle of accusation as a limit. The judgment may not go beyond the acts and the classification of the indictment. Identifying precisely what has been charged is therefore the basis for objecting to any later modification of the conclusions which introduces new acts or a more serious classification.
Individualisation of the participation. Number 3 requires the participation of each accused person to be determined. A collective attribution, which does not distinguish the conduct of each, prevents the defence and is a habitual ground of acquittal in cases with several accused persons.
Circumstances favourable to the accused. Number 4 obliges the prosecution to state the circumstances excluding or mitigating liability which result from the investigation. Their omission, where the file supports them, is a defect which may be raised and which supports the request for their application.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.