Article 251 punishes three forms of property fraud: disposing of a thing while falsely claiming a power of disposal, disposing of it while concealing an encumbrance or disposing of it twice, and entering into a simulated contract to the detriment of another.
The following shall be punished with imprisonment of one to four years:
1. Whoever, falsely claiming over a movable or immovable thing a power of disposal which that person lacks, either by never having held it or by having already exercised it, alienates, encumbers or leases it to another, to the detriment of that person or of a third party.
2. Whoever disposes of a movable or immovable thing concealing the existence of any encumbrance upon it, or whoever, having alienated it as free of encumbrance, encumbers or alienates it again before the definitive transfer to the acquirer, to the detriment of that person or of a third party.
3. Whoever enters into a simulated contract to the detriment of another.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Absence of detriment. The three forms require detriment. Where the acquirer obtained the thing free of encumbrance, where the encumbrance was cancelled or where the price was returned, the objective element fails and the matter belongs to the civil jurisdiction.
Knowledge of the encumbrance. Number 2 requires concealment. Registry information which was publicly accessible, a certificate produced before the deed or the intervention of a notary and of a bank in the transaction are elements which exclude the concealment and, with it, the intent.
Simulation as distinct from a lawful indirect transaction. Number 3 requires a simulated contract to the detriment of another. Transactions structured for reasons of taxation, of succession or of business organisation are not in themselves simulated, and the distinction is habitually resolved by expert accounting and documentary evidence.
Boundary with the offence of Article 248. Where the conduct consists of deception inducing a transfer of assets, the ordinary fraud of Article 248 applies. Identifying the correct provision matters, since the frames and the aggravations of Article 250 are substantially different.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.