Article 351 punishes causing a fire which entails a danger to the life or physical integrity of persons with imprisonment of ten to twenty years, with a possible reduction of one degree, and refers the acts to the criminal damage of Article 266 where no such danger exists.
Also cited as: article 351 Spanish Criminal Code · art. 351 CP · Spanish Penal Code article 351 · artículo 351 del Código Penal.
Those who cause a fire which entails a danger to the life or physical integrity of persons shall be punished with imprisonment of ten to twenty years. Judges and courts may impose the penalty of the next lower degree having regard to the lesser magnitude of the danger caused and to the other circumstances of the act.
Where such danger to the life or physical integrity of persons is not present, the acts shall be punished as the criminal damage provided for in Article 266 of this Code.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Concrete character of the danger. The case law requires a concrete danger to determinate persons and not the abstract possibility of harm. Establishing that the building was empty, that the fire was confined and that no person was within its reach is what refers the conduct to Article 266.
Reduction for lesser magnitude of the danger. The provision itself permits the penalty of the next lower degree. Expert evidence on the propagation, on the materials involved and on the actual distance to occupied areas is the material upon which that reduction is obtained, and the reduction is substantial.
Reclassification as negligence. Where the fire resulted from an imprudent act, and not from an intention to burn, Article 358 applies with a far lower frame. The origin of the fire, established by expert evidence, is habitually the decisive issue.
Voluntary desistance and mitigation. Where the perpetrator acted to extinguish the fire or to warn the occupants, that conduct may amount to a mitigating circumstance of reparation and, in some cases, to a desistance affecting the very existence of the danger.
Defence in this area
If you or your company are facing proceedings in this area, the firm provides defence and prosecution in Alicante and Madrid, with 24-hour assistance to detained persons.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.
Imprisonment of ten to twenty years, with a possible reduction of one degree having regard to the lesser magnitude of the danger. Where no danger to persons exists, the conduct is punished as criminal damage under Article 266.
The causing of a fire, which requires an autonomous propagation of the flames and not merely a localised burning. A danger to the life or physical integrity of persons, which is a concrete and not an abstract danger. Intent covering both the fire and the creation of that danger, negligent conduct falling under Article 358. The absence of that danger, which refers the acts to the criminal damage of Article 266.
Concrete character of the danger. The case law requires a concrete danger to determinate persons and not the abstract possibility of harm. Establishing that the building was empty, that the fire was confined and that no person was within its reach is what refers the conduct to Article 266. Reduction for lesser magnitude of the danger. The provision itself permits the penalty of the next lower degree. Expert evidence on the propagation, on the materials involved and on the actual distance to occupied areas is the material upon which that reduction is obtained, and the reduction is substantial. Reclassification as negligence. Where the fire resulted from an imprudent act, and not from an intention to burn, Article 358 applies with a far lower frame. The origin of the fire, established by expert evidence, is habitually the decisive issue. Voluntary desistance and mitigation.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.