Article 417 punishes the public authority or official who reveals secrets or information obtained by reason of the office which are not to be divulged, with an aggravated frame where serious harm results and a separate frame where the secrets belong to a private individual.
1. The public authority or official who reveals secrets or information of which that person has knowledge by reason of the office or position and which are not to be divulged shall incur a fine of twelve to eighteen months and special disqualification from public employment or office for a term of one to three years.
If serious harm to the public interest or to a third party results from the disclosure referred to in the preceding subparagraph, the penalty shall be imprisonment of one to three years and special disqualification from public employment or office for a term of three to five years.
2. Where the secrets belong to a private individual, the penalties shall be imprisonment of two to four years, a fine of twelve to eighteen months and suspension from public employment or office for a term of one to three years.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Whether the information is reserved. The offence requires the information not to be divulgeable. Information which is publicly accessible, which is subject to the duty of transparency or which had already been disclosed by the administration itself does not satisfy that requirement.
Absence of serious harm. The aggravated frame requires serious harm to the public interest or to a third party. Where no harm is identified, or where it is speculative, the basic frame of a fine applies and the custodial penalty is excluded.
Reporting of unlawful conduct. The disclosure of information in order to report an unlawful act may be covered by the legitimate exercise of a right under Article 20.7, and by the framework on the protection of persons who report breaches. Documenting the internal channels used first is essential.
Attribution of the leak. Where the information circulated among several officials, the attribution of the disclosure to a determinate person requires technical evidence. The access logs and the distribution of the document are the material upon which that attribution is contested.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.