Cassation · Supreme Court · Criminal Chamber

Criminal cassation: a specialism in itself

Cassation technique · offices in Madrid and Alicante

Cassation has a nature of its own: it does not retry the case, it controls the legality of the judgment. The trial plea cannot be repeated: infringements of law, documentary errors of fact or violations of fundamental rights must be identified and formulated with the technique the Second Chamber demands.

In brief. A badly framed ground is inadmitted without examination of the merits; the preparation brief conditions the appeal itself; and the deadline to prepare is five working days from the last notification. Admission is the first battle, and every word counts.

Why it is different

5 days
The deadline to prepare the cassation appeal. The decision cannot wait.
849-852
The LECrim grounds: infringement of law, documentary error and fundamental rights.
2nd
The judgment after cassation: the Chamber annuls and issues a second judgment.

Cassation admits no lawyers without cassation technique

The cassation appeal does not review the trial: it controls the legality of the judgment. The plea of the instance cannot be repeated: infringements of law (Article 849.1), documentary errors of fact (849.2) or violations of fundamental rights (Article 852) must be identified and formulated with the technique the Second Chamber demands. A badly framed ground is inadmitted without any examination of the merits, and the preparation brief conditions the appeal brief.

Every word counts because admission is the first battle. That is why cassation is, in our firm, a specialism in itself: we take on appeals against our own judgments and against judgments litigated by other counsel, with an honest viability assessment in hours.

The framework

The grounds and the route, piece by piece

Art. 849.1 LECrim

Infringement of law

Improper application or non-application of a substantive criminal provision, starting from the proven facts. Key: absolute respect for the factum.
Art. 849.2 LECrim

Documentary error of fact

An error of the court established by self-sufficient documents not contradicted by other evidence. Key: precise designation of the particulars.
Art. 852 LECrim

Violation of fundamental rights

Presumption of innocence, effective judicial protection, a trial with guarantees: the constitutional route within cassation. Key: relevance and prior exhaustion.
Arts. 850–851 LECrim

Breach of form

Denial of evidence, incongruence, predetermination of the ruling and the other formal defects of the judgment. Key: prior protest at the instance.
Art. 847.1.b LECrim

Cassation for unification

Against appellate judgments of the Provincial Courts: limited to infringement of law under 849.1. Route: the cassational interest of the matter.
Art. 855 LECrim

Preparation of the appeal

A brief before the sentencing court within five days: the announcement of grounds that delimits the later appeal. Deadline: five days from the last notification.
Art. 873 LECrim

Filing

Formalisation before the Second Chamber with the complete technical development of each announced ground. Deadline: the one fixed in the summons.
Hearing and ruling

The Chamber’s decision

Inadmission, dismissal or upholding with a second judgment: effects on the conviction and the civil liability. Effect: annulment or cassation of the judgment.
Art. 954 LECrim

Review of final judgments

For new facts, supervening evidence or ECHR condemnations: the final extraordinary remedy. Route: the Chamber’s prior authorisation.
The route

From notification to the second judgment

Stage Deadline What is decided The key point
Viability assessment Hours Whether grounds exist Honest evaluation before spending the client’s money
Preparation 5 working days The announcement delimits everything A ground not announced cannot be developed
Filing Per summons Full technical development The factum is respected or the ground dies
Admission Chamber filter The first battle Most appeals end here
Opposition and hearing Per procedure The adversarial phase Precision beats rhetoric
Judgment Months Inadmission, dismissal or upholding A second judgment where upheld
Amparo 30 days The Constitutional Court route Special constitutional relevance required
Review 954 LECrim Final judgments New facts, evidence or Strasbourg

Deadlines and routes are set out in general terms; each case demands verification of its own dates and procedural situation.

Our differentiator

Technique, honesty and the clock

The Supreme Court reviews the assessment of evidence only through the presumption of innocence: a control of rationality, not a new weighing. It verifies that incriminating evidence exists, is valid and is rationally reasoned; framing the appeal as a disguised second appeal leads to inadmission. Our method is the opposite: identifying the specific legal infringement, formulating it with the Chamber’s technique and respecting the proven facts to the letter.

And honesty first: the statistical success rate is low in general but highly variable with the technique and the ground chosen. If there is a path, we build it rigorously; if there is not, we say so and explore amparo before the Constitutional Court, review under Article 954 or enforcement routes. The five-day clock makes that assessment a matter of hours.

01

Cassation technique

02

Case-law analytics

03

Constitutional strategy

04

Procedural rigour

How we work

From the judgment to the Chamber

Phase 01

Viability assessment in hours

Phase 02

Preparation: the decisive announcement

Phase 03

Filing with full technique

Phase 04

Hearing, judgment and further routes

Who we assist

Each case demands a distinct analysis

C

Convicted persons

Those convicted by Provincial Courts or the National Court: viability assessed within the five-day window.

L

Referring counsel

Trial lawyers seeking cassation specialists: we take the appeal respecting the prior defence.

A

Private prosecutors

Accusations facing acquittals: the narrow but real routes against absolutory judgments.

E

Companies convicted

Legal persons facing Article 33.7 penalties: cassation over the corporate conviction and its consequences.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

I have just been convicted. How long do I have to appeal in cassation?
The preparation brief is filed within five working days from the last notification of the judgment. It is a fatal deadline and the announcement delimits the grounds of the appeal. Contact us immediately: the viability assessment must be done in hours, not weeks.
Can cassation review the assessment of the evidence?
Only through the presumption of innocence: a control of rationality, not a new assessment. The Supreme Court verifies that incriminating evidence exists, is valid and is rationally reasoned. Framing it as a disguised appeal leads to inadmission.
What are the chances of a cassation appeal?
Statistically low in general, but highly variable according to the technique and the chosen ground. We assess honestly: if there is a path, we build it with rigour; if there is not, we will tell you and explore amparo, review or enforcement routes.
And if the Supreme Court dismisses? Is everything over?
Not necessarily. The amparo appeal before the Constitutional Court remains within thirty days, where special constitutional relevance exists; the review of Article 954 for new facts or Strasbourg condemnations; and the routes of enforcement: suspension, accumulation and penitentiary classification.
Do you handle cases from outside Alicante?
Yes. Cassation is heard in Madrid and we take appeals from any court in Spain, coordinating with trial counsel where appropriate.
What is the LIWARD methodology?
It is our own methodology, Legal Intelligence Warfare for Defense, which integrates legal intelligence, case-law analytics and procedural strategy. In cassation it translates into a systematic mapping of the Second Chamber’s doctrine for each ground raised.

Speak to a criminal lawyer

In a fast-track case, the days you have are the case.

Criminal defence in English before the courts of Alicante and the rest of Spain, for residents and for visitors who have flown home.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
London: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, United Kingdom
Paris: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, France
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert is a law firm with offices in Madrid, Alicante, London and Paris, specialising in criminal law, technology law and economic and corporate crime. We provide strategic guidance in complex criminal proceedings, intellectual property and technological resources for legal decision-making with advanced forensic analysis. Our multidisciplinary team combines legal experience, legal intelligence and personal attention to deliver effective solutions adapted to each case. Legal assistance available 24 hours a day and online consultations.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h