Article 849 defines the two grounds of cassation for infringement of law: the infringement of a substantive criminal precept given the facts declared proved, and an error in the assessment of the evidence based upon documents in the file which are not contradicted by other evidential material.
The law shall be taken to have been infringed, for the purpose of the lodging of an appeal in cassation:
1. Where, given the facts declared proved in the decisions covered by the two preceding articles, a substantive criminal precept or another legal rule of the same character which is to be observed in the application of the criminal law has been infringed.
2. Where there has been an error in the assessment of the evidence, based upon documents in the file which demonstrate the mistake of the court without being contradicted by other evidential material.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.
Respect for the facts declared proved. The first ground presupposes the account of the facts as it stands. Any submission which in substance disputes the assessment of the evidence, while formally invoking the infringement of a precept, is inadmissible, so the appeal must be constructed strictly upon the legal consequence of the facts as declared.
Literosufficiency of the document. The second ground requires a document which by itself demonstrates the error, without the need for further reasoning or additional evidence. Statements, expert reports and records of proceedings are not, as a rule, documents for these purposes, which considerably narrows the ground.
Absence of contradictory evidence. The document must not be contradicted by other evidential material. Identifying at the outset whether the file contains such material determines whether the ground is viable, and it is preferable to concentrate the appeal upon the first ground where it is not.
Consequence of a successful appeal. Where the first ground succeeds, the Supreme Court hands down a second judgment. Setting out precisely the penalty or the classification which is sought in that second judgment is part of the appeal itself and should not be left to the court.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.