Criminal defence throughout Spain · 24-hour assistance · offices in Madrid and Alicante
Article 557, as worded by Organic Law 14/2022 and in force since 12 January 2023, punishes those who, acting in a group and with the aim of attacking public peace, execute violence or intimidation against persons or property, or obstruct public roads endangering life or health.
In brief. The word “group” is in the offence, and there the practical problem begins. Spanish criminal law knows no liability for another’s act: Articles 27 to 29 require identifying what each person did and in what capacity they answer. Being present, shouting, filming or belonging to the same gathering is, by itself, none of those things. And the aim of attacking public peace must be proven for each accused, not deduced from two hundred people in the street.
Article 557 punishes those who, acting in a group and with the aim of attacking public peace, execute acts of violence or intimidation against persons or property, or obstruct public roads endangering the life or health of those using them. The basic penalty is six months to three years. The word “group” is in the offence, and there the practical problem begins: Spanish criminal law knows no liability for another’s act. Articles 27 to 29 require identifying what each person did and in what capacity they answer: as perpetrator, co-perpetrator with a division of roles, necessary cooperator or accomplice. Being present, shouting, filming with a phone or forming part of the same gathering is, by itself, none of those four things.
A further element many police reports overlook: the offence requires a purpose, that of attacking public peace, which must be proven for each accused rather than deduced from the presence of two hundred people in the street. Someone swept along by a police charge, fleeing, separating two people fighting or responding to a prior attack does not, without more, share the tendential element of Article 557. Where the accusation narrates the facts in the plural, the defence forces the individualisation.
| Conduct | Article | Penalty framework | Key factor |
|---|---|---|---|
| Public disorder (basic) | 557.1 | 6 months – 3 years | Individualised conduct and proven purpose |
| Crowd-aggravated | 557.2 | 3 – 5 years + disqualification | Real organisation versus spontaneous crowd |
| Dangerous objects and pillage | 557.3 | Upper half; firearms, one degree up | Who carried what |
| Preparatory acts | 557.4 | One or two degrees lower | Concrete resolution, not bravado |
| Crushes and stampedes | 557.5 | 6 months – 2 years | Crowded venues |
| Group occupation | 557 bis | 3 – 6 months or fine | Relevant disturbance of the activity |
| Disturbance of public acts | 558 | 3 – 6 months or fine | Courtrooms, polling stations, spectacles |
| Incitement messages | 559 | Fine or imprisonment | Screenshots and their authentication |
Penalty ranges are indicative and set out the ordinary framework; the sentence actually imposed depends on the circumstances of each case.
The defence of these cases is the defence of the individual against the plural narrative. The whole video must be watched, not the report’s fragment, checking image quality, distance, lighting and continuity, how the file reached the case and who held it; appearing in an image is not executing violence in it. The disguise aggravation requires an effective means of concealment sought on purpose: an ordinary garment, worn before anything happened and by many others in the same place, does not qualify, and the point is won with context.
The administrative route runs in parallel: the Organic Law 4/2015 sanction is a fine without prison or record, and where the facts are under criminal investigation the administrative file must be suspended until a final judicial decision. Detention in collective arrests observes the same seventy-two-hour ceiling, with habeas corpus available. And civil liability is usually requested jointly against all the accused, which presupposes that all took part in the damage: where your causation is not on record, that extension is fought.
Those detained or identified at gatherings, festivals or protests: individualisation of conduct and purpose.
First-time accused after a night incident or a demonstration: records, suspension and proportional outcomes.
Conveners of events and associations facing Article 559 or occupation charges: the border with fundamental rights.
Non-nationals for whom a conviction affects residence: thresholds computed before any negotiated judgment.
Speak to a criminal lawyer
Criminal defence in English before the courts of Alicante and the rest of Spain, for residents and for visitors who have flown home.
Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert es un despacho de abogados con sedes en Madrid, Alicante, Londres y París, especializado en defensa y acusación penal, delitos económicos y corporativos y derecho tecnológico. Trabajamos con orientación estratégica en procedimientos penales complejos, propiedad intelectual y análisis forense avanzado, y prestamos consultoría jurídica, compliance y escudos de protección a particulares y empresas. Atendemos desde Alicante y Madrid, con consulta online en toda España y asistencia al detenido 24 horas. Resuelva sus dudas en las preguntas frecuentes o solicite una primera consulta.
Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.
