Article 180 sets the aggravated penalty frames for the sexual assaults of Articles 178 and 179 where any of seven circumstances is present, among them joint action by two or more persons, extreme violence, special vulnerability of the victim, a partner relationship, abuse of superiority, the use of weapons and the administration of substances.
1. The foregoing forms of conduct shall be punished, respectively, with imprisonment of two to eight years for the assaults of Article 178.1, imprisonment of five to ten years for the assaults of Article 178.3, imprisonment of seven to fifteen years for the assaults of Article 179.1 and imprisonment of twelve to fifteen years for those of Article 179.2, where any of the following circumstances is present:
1st. Where the acts are committed by the joint action of two or more persons.
2nd. Where the sexual assault is preceded or accompanied by violence of extreme seriousness or by acts of a particularly degrading or humiliating character.
3rd. Where the acts are committed against a person who is in a situation of special vulnerability by reason of age, illness, disability or any other circumstance, save as provided in Article 181.
4th. Where the victim is or has been the spouse, or a woman who is or has been bound by an analogous relationship of affection, even without cohabitation.
5th. Where, in order to commit the offence, the person responsible took advantage of a situation or relationship of cohabitation or of kinship, or of a relationship of superiority in respect of the victim.
6th. Where the person responsible makes use of weapons or other equally dangerous means, capable of causing death or any of the injuries provided for in Articles 149 and 150 of this Code, without prejudice to the provisions of Article 194 bis.
7th. Where, in order to commit these acts, the person responsible has overcome the will of the victim by administering medicines, drugs or any other natural or chemical substance suitable for that purpose.
Where, in the description of the typical forms of conduct provided for in Articles 178 or 179, any of the foregoing circumstances has been taken into account, the conflict shall be resolved in accordance with the rule of Article 8.4 of this Code.
2. Where two or more of the foregoing circumstances are present, the penalties respectively laid down in paragraph 1 of this article shall be imposed in their upper half.
3. In all the cases provided for in this Chapter, where the offender took advantage of the status of authority, agent thereof or public official, the penalty of absolute disqualification of six to twelve years shall also be imposed.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Prohibition of double assessment. The final subparagraph of paragraph 1 expressly refers to Article 8.4 where the circumstance has already been weighed in the basic offence. Identifying that overlap prevents the same fact from operating twice and may reduce the applicable frame by several years.
Joint action distinguished from mere presence. The first circumstance requires a genuine joint execution which reinforces the situation of the victim. Presence at the scene, a subsequent arrival or a contribution unconnected with the sexual act does not satisfy it, and the individual conduct of each accused must be established separately.
Extreme seriousness and degrading character. The second circumstance calls for a qualitative excess over the violence inherent in the basic offence. Because the concept is a normative one, the forensic and expert evidence on the conduct actually carried out is the material on which the aggravation is contested.
Weapons and equally dangerous means. The sixth circumstance requires that the means used be capable of causing death or the injuries of Articles 149 and 150. The mere carrying of an object, without its use or its exhibition in a coercive manner, does not satisfy the requirement.
Reliability of a single item of testimony. Where the conviction rests upon the testimony of the complainant, the case law requires the absence of subjective animus, sufficient objective corroboration and persistence in the accusation. Discrepancies between the successive statements, and their contrast with the objective evidence, remain the central line of defence.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.