Article 21 lists the mitigating circumstances: incomplete grounds of exemption, serious addiction, states of passion, confession before knowing of the proceedings, reparation of the harm, extraordinary and undue delay, and any other circumstance of analogous significance.
The following are mitigating circumstances:
1. The grounds set out in the preceding Chapter, where not all the requirements necessary to exempt from liability in their respective cases are present.
2. That the offender acted by reason of a serious addiction to the substances mentioned in number 2 of the preceding article.
3. That the offender acted for causes or stimuli so powerful as to have produced a fit of rage, obfuscation or another state of passion of similar magnitude.
4. That the offender, before knowing that the judicial proceedings are directed against that person, confessed the infringement to the authorities.
5. That the offender repaired the harm caused to the victim, or reduced its effects, at any time in the proceedings and before the holding of the trial hearing.
6. Extraordinary and undue delay in the conduct of the proceedings, provided that it is not attributable to the accused and bears no proportion to the complexity of the case.
7. Any other circumstance of significance analogous to the foregoing.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Reparation of the harm as a very qualified circumstance. Number 5 is available at any time before the trial hearing and does not require full reparation, only a genuine effort proportionate to the means of the accused. Where the reparation is substantial, the case law admits its treatment as very qualified, which opens the reduction of one or two degrees under Article 66.1.2.
Confession and its timeliness. Number 4 requires the confession to precede knowledge that proceedings are directed against the accused. Where that condition is not met, the analogous mitigating circumstance of number 7 is habitually available where the acknowledgement has materially facilitated the investigation.
Extraordinary and undue delay. Number 6 calls for the identification of the specific periods of inactivity, their duration and the absence of any procedural conduct of the defence which caused them. A chronological schedule of the file is the technical instrument which sustains this circumstance and, where the delay is exceptional, its treatment as very qualified.
Addiction as distinct from mere consumption. Number 2 requires a serious addiction operating as the cause of the conduct, and not mere consumption at the time of the act. Clinical documentation of the dependence, of the treatment followed and of the connection with the offence charged is what distinguishes this circumstance from a simple personal circumstance.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.