Article 241 punishes robbery committed in an inhabited house, in a building or premises open to the public or in their outbuildings, and it defines both concepts. The frame rises where the acts are of special seriousness or where a circumstance of Article 235 is present.
1. Robbery committed in an inhabited house, in a building or premises open to the public, or in any of their outbuildings, shall be punished with imprisonment of two to five years.
Where the acts have been committed in an establishment open to the public, or in any of its outbuildings, outside opening hours, imprisonment of one to five years shall be imposed.
2. An inhabited house is taken to be any dwelling which constitutes the abode of one or more persons, even where they are accidentally absent from it when the robbery takes place.
3. The outbuildings of an inhabited house or of a building or premises open to the public are taken to be their yards, garages and other departments or enclosed sites which are contiguous to the building and in internal communication with it, and with which they form a physical unit.
4. Imprisonment of two to six years shall be imposed where the acts referred to in the preceding paragraphs are of special seriousness, having regard to the manner of commission of the offence or to the loss caused and, in all cases, where one of the circumstances set out in Article 235 is present.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Whether the dwelling was inhabited. Paragraph 2 requires the place to constitute the abode of one or more persons. Dwellings which are uninhabited, empty for long periods, under construction or in a state of abandonment fall outside the aggravation, and the report of the police inspection is the material upon which the point is contested.
The concept of an outbuilding. Paragraph 3 requires internal communication with the building and a physical unit with it. A garage with independent access from the street, or an enclosure which is merely adjacent, does not satisfy the definition, which excludes the aggravated frame.
Special seriousness of paragraph 4. The aggravation requires an assessment of the manner of commission or of the loss caused. A generic reference to the value of the property taken, without a reasoned assessment of that seriousness, is a defect of motivation which affects the frame applied.
Prohibition of double assessment. Where the circumstance of Article 235 relied upon has already been weighed in the description of the conduct or in the assessment of the special seriousness, its double application is precluded by Article 67. Identifying that overlap may reduce the penalty by a full degree.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.