Article 786 governs the fixing of the date of the trial hearing in the abbreviated procedure where there is no plea of guilty, the criteria which the listing must take into account, and the duty to inform the victim of the date, time and place of the trial and of the content of the accusation.
1. If there is no agreement of the parties, once the judge or court has ruled orally in accordance with paragraph 3 of the preceding article, provided that the listing can be made in the same act, the day and hour on which the sessions of the trial hearing are to begin shall be fixed, in accordance with the provisions of Article 182 of Act 1/2000 of 7 January, on Civil Procedure. The parties, their counsel and the public prosecutor must state any coincidence with other listings or any other reasons which might prevent the holding of the trial on the date fixed.
In the other cases the day and hour shall be fixed by the court clerk in accordance with the general criteria and the specific instructions referred to in that provision of Act 1/2000 of 7 January.
Where the judge or court has not ruled orally, the listing must be made by the court clerk immediately after the order referred to in paragraph 3 of the preceding article has been handed down.
2. The general criteria and the specific instructions fixed by the presidents of the chamber or section, and by the criminal court judges, in accordance with which the listing is to be made, shall also take into account:
1. The detention of the accused person.
2. The securing of the presence of that person at the disposal of the court.
3. The other personal precautionary measures adopted.
4. The priority of other cases.
5. The complexity of the evidence proposed or any modifying circumstance, as they may have been determined once the matter or dispute in question has been studied.
3. Where the victim has so requested, even where not a party to the proceedings and not required to intervene, the court clerk must inform that person, in writing and without unnecessary delay, of the date, time and place of the trial, as well as of the content of the accusation directed against the offender.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.
Statement of impediments at the time. Paragraph 1 obliges the parties to state any coincidence of listings at the moment at which the date is fixed. Failure to raise the impediment at that point weakens any later application for suspension, so the objection must be recorded in the same act.
Priority of cases with a detained accused person. The criteria of paragraph 2 place the detention of the accused person first. Where a person is in pre trial detention, invoking those criteria is the ordinary route for obtaining an earlier listing and, failing that, for supporting an application for release on the ground of the time elapsed.
Time for the preparation of the defence. A listing made without regard to the complexity of the evidence proposed may result in a material inability to prepare the defence. Documenting the volume of the file and the expert evidence required is what sustains an application for a later date.
Information addressed to the victim. Paragraph 3 confers a right upon the victim upon request. Verifying that the information was given, or that it was not requested, avoids later challenges to the hearing based upon an alleged omission.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.