info@societejuridique.com
Madrid: Paseo de la Castellana 216 8 ª Planta
Alicante: Av. Ansaldo Nº31, local 16
24h emergencies: 669 30 21 13

Social media:

Handling stolen goods · Article 298 CP

Handling stolen goods: the knowledge battle

Criminal defence throughout Spain · offices in Madrid and Alicante

Article 298.1 punishes whoever, for gain and knowing of a property offence in which they took no part, helps the perpetrators to profit from the effects, or receives, acquires or conceals them. Read like that it seems simple; each element is a distinct evidential battle.

In brief. The object almost always traces itself (a theft report, an IMEI in a database, a marked registration plate). What is contested is whether you knew where it came from. There is no negligent handling: knowledge must be proven, usually by inference from price, place and circumstances. Buying a stolen item is not an offence if you did not know its origin.

Why it is different

6m-2y
Imprisonment for the basic offence of Article 298.1 CP.
1-3 yrs
Where received for trade from commercial premises, with a fine of twelve to twenty-four months (Art. 298.2 CP).
122 CP
Even if acquitted, you may have to return the object or its value as a gratuitous beneficiary.

What Article 298 really punishes

Article 298.1 punishes whoever, with intent to profit and with knowledge of a property or socio-economic offence in which they intervened neither as perpetrator nor as accomplice, helps those responsible to profit from the effects or receives, acquires or conceals those effects. The object almost always traces itself: a theft report, an IMEI in a database, a marked plate. What is litigated is whether you knew where it came from.

Three clarifications matter from day one. The prior offence must be against property or the socio-economic order: effects from other offences may constitute concealment (Art. 451) or laundering (Art. 301), but not handling. The author of the theft need not be convicted or even identified: Article 300 expressly so provides, though the existence of the prior offence must be proven. And whoever stole cannot also be convicted for handling what they themselves stole: self-concealment is not doubly punished.

Scenarios

The situations we see most often

Art. 298.2 CP

Gold and second-hand jewellery buyers

The classic scenario: chains and rings bought by weight, often with broken clasps, and an incomplete register book. The trade is subject to registration and identification duties under Article 25 of Organic Law 4/2015. A well-kept register is the best defence; an empty one is the first incriminating indication.
Art. 298.1 CP

Mobile phones and electronics

The IMEI makes every terminal traceable. The discussion turns on the price paid, iCloud or Google locks, the lack of box and invoice, and whether the buyer asked the seller for identification.
Arts. 298 and 392 CP

Vehicles, motorcycles and mopeds

Purchases without transfer at the Traffic Department, contracts signed by untraceable persons, prices far below valuation and papers that do not match the chassis number. Manipulated documents add forgery, which aggravates the picture significantly.
Art. 298.2 CP

Spare parts and scrapyards

Airbags, headlights, catalytic converters and control units acquired without traceability. The accusation relies on the homogeneity of the stock, the absence of delivery notes and the buyer’s professional knowledge.
Art. 298.1 b) CP

Copper, cabling and infrastructure

Scrap dealers receiving stripped copper cable, electrical supply material or telecommunications components. The aggravated form applies, and what is valued is not only the metal but the installation destroyed to obtain it.
Art. 298.1 b) CP

Agricultural and irrigation material

Pumps, sprinklers, piping and machinery taken from farms. The same aggravated form covers agricultural and livestock products and the instruments used to obtain them, which surprises buyers who assumed it was simple used material.
Art. 298.1 a) CP

Goods of artistic or cultural value

Antiques, religious images, coins and objects from plunder or home burglaries. The aggravation operates by the nature of the item regardless of market value, and the expert report on its artistic or historic character becomes the axis of the proceedings.
Arts. 451 and 454 CP

Help without profit motive

Keeping at home what a relative brought, lending a storage room or moving objects without economic gain. Without profit motive there is no handling, but there may be concealment; and where the person helped is a spouse, ascendant, descendant or sibling, the family exemption of Article 454 may operate.
Art. 301 CP

The border with money laundering

Where what is received is not the object but the money, or the operation repeats and is organised to give the assets a lawful appearance, the classification can shift to laundering, with a far higher range. Contesting the correct classification from the investigation stage is the most important decision of the whole defence.
Penalties and procedure

Penalties, processing and real consequences

QuestionRuleFrameworkKey point
Basic offence298.16 months – 2 yearsKnowledge and profit motive must be proven
Aggravated forms298.1 a) b)1 – 3 yearsArtistic goods, infrastructure, agricultural material
Trade from premises298.21 – 3 years + fine 12 – 24 monthsProfessional disqualification 2 – 5 years and closure possible
CourtCompetenceCriminal Court (Juzgado de lo Penal)Penalty never exceeds five years
Fast track795 ss. LECrimFrequent after flagrant arrestNegotiated judgment with a one-third reduction available
Confiscation127 CPThe effects are seizedReturn of the object to the owner
Gratuitous beneficiary122 CPRestitution even after acquittalCivil liability up to the benefit received
Limitation131 CPFive years in all formsComputation disputes with prolonged concealment

Penalty ranges are indicative and set out the ordinary framework; the sentence actually imposed depends on the circumstances of each case.

What the courts require

A trial of inference: how knowledge is proven and contested

These are almost always circumstantial-evidence cases with immediate arrest. The prosecution infers knowledge from the price, the place of purchase, the absence of documents and the buyer’s experience; the defence attacks the quality of each indication and builds reasonable alternative explanations: a public advertisement, a traceable payment, a price within the second-hand market, identification requested from the seller. There is no negligent handling: without proven knowledge there is no offence.

On arrest and access to the police report before any statement, the constitutional doctrine of STC 21/2018 of 5 March (ECLI:ES:TC:2018:21) applies. Where case-law support is needed on the specific indications of handling (vile price, absence of invoice), it is located and verified in writing for the specific matter before being included in any pleading; we do not cite what we cannot verify. This page does not constitute legal advice.

01

Legal intelligence

02

Case-law analytics

03

Documentary evidence

04

Procedural strategy

How we intervene

A strategy sustained through every phase

Phase 01

Arrest and first statement

Phase 02

Documentation of the purchase

Phase 03

Classification: 298, 451 or 301

Phase 04

Trial, reparation and appeals

Who we represent

Each profile demands a distinct defence

P

Private buyers

Individuals who bought a phone, vehicle or item that turned out stolen: proof of good faith and of the market conditions of the purchase.

C

Trade professionals

Gold buyers, scrapyards, second-hand shops and recyclers: register books, identification duties and defence of the establishment.

F

Family members

Those who kept or moved objects for a relative: the border between handling, concealment and the family exemption.

V

Owners of stolen goods

Victims tracing their property: restitution, the Article 122 claim against gratuitous beneficiaries and civil recovery.

FAQ

What to know before the first consultation

I bought a phone online and it turned out stolen. Will I be convicted?
Not necessarily. Buying a stolen object is not an offence if you did not know its origin. Article 298 requires knowledge, and negligent handling does not exist. What will matter is what you paid, to whom, where and what documentation you keep. A public advertisement, a traceable payment and a market price are solid elements in your favour. Returning the terminal is another matter: you will probably have to.
How cheap must the price be to count as an indication?
There is no legal percentage or table. The courts speak of a notoriously inferior or vile price, weighed against the object, its condition and the second-hand market. In practice, a twenty or thirty per cent discount on a used item raises no eyebrows; paying ten or fifteen per cent of the real value does. Anyone giving you an exact figure is selling you false security.
If the thief is never found, can there be a handling conviction?
Yes. Article 300 allows these rules to apply even where the author of the prior offence is not liable or exempt from punishment, and the case law does not require the author to be identified or convicted. What must be proven is that a prior property offence existed. If that is not established, the handling charge falls with it.
I run a gold-buying shop. What actually protects me?
A complete and current register book, a copy of the seller’s identity document, a signed declaration on the origin of the piece, preservation of recordings and observance of the retention periods. These duties flow from Article 25 of Organic Law 4/2015. Compliance does not grant immunity, but it turns every transaction into a documented fact and defuses the main indication against you.
What is the difference between handling, concealment and laundering?
Handling (Art. 298) requires profit motive and a prior property or socio-economic offence. Concealment (Art. 451) requires no profit motive, can concern any offence and has a family exemption in certain cases. Laundering (Art. 301) centres on giving a lawful appearance to assets of criminal origin and carries a much higher range. The correct classification is not a technicality: it can double the penalty.
I am summoned as a suspect and hold a residence permit. What risk do I run?
Besides the penalty, two specific risks. A prison sentence above one year can be replaced by expulsion under Article 89, with a stricter regime for EU citizens. And criminal records weigh on permit renewals and on nationality. With that information on the table, decisions such as accepting a negotiated judgment are taken differently.
If I return the object, is the case closed?
Not automatically. Restitution does not erase the offence, but it has two real effects: it supports the reparation mitigating circumstance of Article 21.5 and usually defuses the private prosecution, which often only wants its property back. In moderate-value cases without a record, that combination markedly improves the outcome.
Can I keep what I bought if I am acquitted?
Normally not. Article 122 allows civil liability to be declared against whoever benefited gratuitously from the effects of an offence, with an obligation to restore up to the amount of their benefit, even if acquitted. And Article 464 of the Civil Code lets the owner recover movable property of which they were unlawfully deprived, save purchases in shops open to the public. Your claim for the price lies against whoever sold to you.
When does handling become time-barred?
After five years, under Article 131, in both the basic and the aggravated forms, since none reaches five years of maximum penalty. The dispute usually concerns the starting date where there is prolonged concealment or repeated activity, and whether investigative acts interrupted the period.

Speak to a criminal lawyer

In a fast-track case, the days you have are the case.

Criminal defence in English before the courts of Alicante and the rest of Spain, for residents and for visitors who have flown home.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
Londres: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, Reino Unido
París: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, Francia
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert es un despacho de abogados con sedes en Madrid, Alicante, Londres y París, especializado en defensa y acusación penal, delitos económicos y corporativos y derecho tecnológico. Trabajamos con orientación estratégica en procedimientos penales complejos, propiedad intelectual y análisis forense avanzado, y prestamos consultoría jurídica, compliance y escudos de protección a particulares y empresas. Atendemos desde Alicante y Madrid, con consulta online en toda España y asistencia al detenido 24 horas. Resuelva sus dudas en las preguntas frecuentes o solicite una primera consulta.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h