Directors and executives · Article 31 CP

Criminal defence of directors: decisions judged years later

Criminal defence throughout Spain · offices in Madrid and Alicante

A director’s indictment has a characteristic of its own: business decisions are judged years later. What was a reasonable management decision in its context is examined retrospectively as a possible offence.

In brief. Article 31 extends authorship to the de facto or de jure director, but does not turn the office into automatic guilt. The defence requires reconstructing the economic context of each decision, the advice received and the real distribution of functions in the organisation.

Why it is different

31 CP
The office turns management decisions into personal criminal risk, but not into automatic guilt.
2
Offices in Madrid and Alicante; assistance anywhere in Spain.
LIWARD
Our own methodology of legal intelligence and forensic analysis.

The executive’s defence admits no criminal lawyers foreign to the company

A director’s indictment has its own characteristic: business decisions are judged with years of distance. What was a reasonable management decision in its context, a related-party transaction, a refinancing, a tax deferral in a cash crisis, is examined retrospectively as a possible offence. The defence requires reconstructing the economic context of each decision, the advice received and the real distribution of functions in the organisation.

Article 31 extends authorship to the de facto or de jure director, but it does not turn the office into automatic guilt: real intervention in the specific decision, or the breach of a duty of control demandable of the specific position, must be proven. That is why the defence of executives demands criminal lawyers who understand the company.

The exposure

The fronts on which a director answers

Disloyal administration

Excess of powers with financial harm: remuneration, related-party transactions, guarantees to third parties. Penalty: six months to six years according to the amount.
Arts. 290–297 CP

Corporate offences

Falsified accounts, abusive resolutions, denial of shareholders’ rights: the internal-conflict front. Penalty: up to three years according to the figure.
Arts. 305–310 CP

Tax offences

Liability for the company’s tax decisions, via Article 31: the amount, the intent and the delegation. Penalty: one to six years according to the offence.
Arts. 257–261 CP

Punishable insolvencies

Questioned pre-insolvency transactions: asset concealment, favouring of creditors, culpable insolvency. Penalty: one to four years and a fine.

Offences against workers

Working conditions, health and safety and accidents: liability of directors and middle management. Penalty: six months to six years according to the figure.
Art. 31 CP

Acting on behalf of another

The clause transferring authorship to the de facto or de jure director: its scope is the central battle. Key: delimiting functions and delegations.

Commission by omission

Liability for failing to prevent subordinates’ offences: the duty of guarantor, delegation and control. Key: the real supervision structure.
Compliance

Preventive defence

Documented decision protocols, expert advice and traceability: the executive’s prior shield. Effect: proof of due diligence.
D&O

Coordination with D&O insurance

Activation of directors’ liability policies: defence costs and civil bonds covered. Key: early notification of the claim.
The battlegrounds

Where the director’s defence is decided

Question Rule What is examined Defence focus
Real intervention 31 CP Who took the specific decision Minutes, powers and the actual chain of decision
Duty of control 11 CP What supervision was demandable Structure, resources and documented delegation
Business judgment 226 LSC Good faith, information, procedure Prior reports and external advice
Delegation Case law Real, funded and supervised A signature on an organisation chart is not delegation
Position on the board Case law Executive versus non-executive Information available at each moment
Advice received Records Expert opinions before deciding The document that excludes intent
D&O policy Contract Defence costs and bonds Early notification preserves cover
Separate defences Practice Company and director may diverge One lawyer for all is often a paid-for conflict

The exposure depends on the offence charged and the specific facts; this overview is indicative.

Our differentiator

Reconstructing the context of the decision

The useful defence of an executive is built backwards: reconstructing the economic context in which the decision was taken, the information available at that moment, the advice received and the real distribution of functions. The board member who decided with prior reports, within a documented procedure and without personal interest is protected by business judgment; the one who cannot prove any of it is exposed. We prepare that file before it is demanded, and we coordinate the criminal defence with the D&O policy and, where interests diverge, with the company’s separate defence. We apply LIWARD, Legal Intelligence Warfare for Defense.

01

Legal intelligence

02

Financial and accounting analysis

03

Documentary evidence

04

Procedural strategy

How we work

From prevention to trial

Phase 01

Reconstruction of functions and delegations

Phase 02

Context and advice of each decision

Phase 03

D&O coordination and separate defences

Phase 04

Investigation, trial and appeals

Who we represent

Each profile demands a distinct defence

A

Sole and executive directors

Directors answering for management decisions: real intervention, context and business judgment.

C

Board members

Non-executive, proprietary and independent directors: the duty of control demandable of each position.

D

General managers and executives

De facto directors and senior managers: the reach of Article 31 and the delegation actually held.

F

Family businesses

Family-company administrators where formal and real roles diverge: documenting who decided what.

FAQ

Frequently asked questions

I am a director and the company is under investigation. Will I be charged?
Not automatically, but Article 31 facilitates it: the key is your real intervention in the specific decision. It is advisable to prepare now the documentary reconstruction of functions, delegations and advice. The earlier that file is ordered, the more solid the defence.
Does a proprietary or independent board member answer like an executive?
No: the case law requires effective intervention or the breach of the duty of control demandable of each position. The real distribution of functions, the delegated committees and the information available at each moment delimit very different responsibilities.
Can D&O insurance protect me in criminal proceedings?
Yes, economically: it usually covers defence costs and civil bonds, not criminal fines. Early notification of the claim and coordination between the criminal defence and the policy prevent losing cover through deadlines or conflicts.
What if the questioned decision was taken with external advice?
It is one of the strongest defences: a prior expert opinion documents diligence and excludes intent. The report, its date and its relationship to the decision must be reconstructed and produced in an orderly fashion, not improvised at the statement.
Do you handle cases outside Alicante?
Yes. We operate from Madrid and Alicante and assist directors anywhere in Spain.
What is the LIWARD methodology?
It is our own methodology, Legal Intelligence Warfare for Defense, which integrates legal intelligence, financial and accounting analysis and documentary evidence into a single procedural strategy.

Speak to a criminal lawyer

In a fast-track case, the days you have are the case.

Criminal defence in English before the courts of Alicante and the rest of Spain, for residents and for visitors who have flown home.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
London: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, United Kingdom
Paris: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, France
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert is a law firm with offices in Madrid, Alicante, London and Paris, specialising in criminal law, technology law and economic and corporate crime. We provide strategic guidance in complex criminal proceedings, intellectual property and technological resources for legal decision-making with advanced forensic analysis. Our multidisciplinary team combines legal experience, legal intelligence and personal attention to deliver effective solutions adapted to each case. Legal assistance available 24 hours a day and online consultations.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h