Article 730 Spanish Criminal Procedure Act: Reading of Evidence Taken During the Investigation

Article 730 of the Criminal Procedure Act permits, at the request of any party, the reading or reproduction at trial of steps taken during the investigation which for reasons independent of the party’s will cannot be reproduced at the hearing. Its second paragraph permits the reproduction of the audiovisual recording of a victim’s or witness’s statement taken as preconstituted evidence during the investigation under article 449 bis. The article is the exception to the rule that only evidence taken at trial may found a judgment, and its limits are strictly construed.

Also cited as: article 730 Spanish Criminal Procedure Act · art. 730 LECrim · LECrim article 730 · artículo 730 de la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Criminal.

Wording of Article 730 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act

1. Steps taken during the investigation which, for reasons independent of the will of the parties, cannot be reproduced at the trial may also be read or reproduced at the request of any of the parties.

2. At the request of any of the parties, the audiovisual recording of the statement of a victim or witness taken as preconstituted evidence during the investigation stage in accordance with article 449 bis may be reproduced.

Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.

Effect. The article confers no penalty. Its effect is to allow material from the investigation to be treated as evidence at trial in the two situations it describes, and, by implication, to exclude it in every other. Evidence read in breach of the article cannot found a conviction, and its use is challengeable on appeal and in cassation through article 852.

Requirements and procedure

  1. A step actually taken during the investigation and documented in the file.
  2. Impossibility of reproducing it at trial, arising from a cause independent of the will of the party seeking to rely on it: death, untraceable whereabouts, or an incapacity supervening after the statement.
  3. For the second paragraph, compliance with the requirements of article 449 bis for preconstituted evidence, including the presence of the defence and the opportunity to question.
  4. A request by a party, since the court cannot introduce the material of its own motion.

Defence strategy

The impossibility was not genuine. This is the decisive question in most cases. A witness who has returned to his own country, who has changed address or who has simply not been summoned correctly is not unavailable: the impossibility must be real and must not be attributable to the party relying on it. The defence obtains the record of the attempts at service and, where a witness resides abroad, examines whether the mechanisms for taking evidence by videoconference or through mutual assistance were used.

Absence of the defence when the statement was taken. Material taken during the investigation without the defence present, or before the accused was identified and represented, cannot be converted into evidence by reading it at trial, because the accused never had the opportunity to question. This objection is decisive and it is verified against the record of the step itself, not against the summary in the indictment.

Requirements of preconstituted evidence. Reproduction under the second paragraph presupposes that the statement complied with article 449 bis: judicial supervision, audiovisual recording, presence of the defence and a genuine opportunity to question. Where any of those conditions is missing, the recording is not preconstituted evidence and its reproduction cannot replace live testimony.

Weight where reading is permitted. Even where the reading is admissible, the material was not subject to cross-examination at trial, and the defence addresses its weight: the absence of contemporaneous corroboration, the conditions in which the statement was taken and any inconsistency with the rest of the file. A conviction resting exclusively on read material requires particular scrutiny, and that submission is made expressly for the purposes of any later appeal.

Defence in this area

If you or your company are facing proceedings in this area, the firm provides defence and prosecution in Alicante and Madrid, with 24-hour assistance to detained persons.

Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.

This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.

Frequently asked questions

What effect does the application of Article 730 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act produce?

The article confers no penalty. Its effect is to allow material from the investigation to be treated as evidence at trial in the two situations it describes, and, by implication, to exclude it in every other. Evidence read in breach of the article cannot found a conviction, and its use is challengeable on appeal and in cassation through article 852.

What requirements and procedure does Article 730 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act lay down?

A step actually taken during the investigation and documented in the file. Impossibility of reproducing it at trial, arising from a cause independent of the will of the party seeking to rely on it: death, untraceable whereabouts, or an incapacity supervening after the statement. For the second paragraph, compliance with the requirements of article 449 bis for preconstituted evidence, including the presence of the defence and the opportunity to question. A request by a party, since the court cannot introduce the material of its own motion.

How does the defence make use of Article 730 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act?

The impossibility was not genuine. This is the decisive question in most cases. A witness who has returned to his own country, who has changed address or who has simply not been summoned correctly is not unavailable: the impossibility must be real and must not be attributable to the party relying on it. The defence obtains the record of the attempts at service and, where a witness resides abroad, examines whether the mechanisms for taking evidence by videoconference or through mutual assistance were used. Absence of the defence when the statement was taken. Material taken during the investigation without the defence present, or before the accused was identified and represented, cannot be converted into evidence by reading it at trial, because the accused never had the opportunity to question.

Is the English text of Article 730 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act official?

Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
London: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, United Kingdom
Paris: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, France
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert is a law firm with offices in Madrid, Alicante, London and Paris, specialising in criminal law, technology law and economic and corporate crime. We provide strategic guidance in complex criminal proceedings, intellectual property and technological resources for legal decision-making with advanced forensic analysis. Our multidisciplinary team combines legal experience, legal intelligence and personal attention to deliver effective solutions adapted to each case. Legal assistance available 24 hours a day and online consultations.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h