Article 179 of the Spanish Criminal Code governs sexual assault involving carnal access or the introduction of body parts or objects, the conduct that Spanish law names rape. It is the gravest offence in this part of the Code outside cases involving minors, with imprisonment of four to twelve years, rising to six to twelve years where violence or intimidation was used or the complainant’s will was overcome. Because the lower limit of the range excludes any possibility of suspension, an accusation under this article means that pre-trial detention will be sought and that the defence must be organised from the first hours.
1. Where the sexual assault consists in carnal access by the vaginal, anal or oral route, or in the introduction of body parts or objects by either of the first two routes, the person responsible shall be punished as guilty of rape with imprisonment of four to twelve years.
2. Where the assault referred to in the preceding paragraph is committed using violence or intimidation, or where the victim’s will has been overcome for any reason, the penalty shall be imprisonment of six to twelve years.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Immediate action on the physical evidence. In this class of case the first seventy-two hours determine what evidence will exist at trial. The defence intervenes at once to ensure that the forensic examination of the accused is carried out, that clothing and bedding are secured, that the venue and street recordings are preserved before the retention period expires, and that the accused’s telephone is imaged rather than merely inspected. Material lost in those first days cannot be recovered, and its absence is invariably resolved against the accused.
The reliability of the account. Where there is no independent evidence, Spanish law permits a conviction on the complainant’s testimony alone, but only where it is subjectively credible, internally coherent and corroborated by peripheral elements. The defence therefore works on the peripheral material: the sequence of movements shown by the door records and cameras, the content and timing of messages, the accounts of those who saw the parties before and after, and any inconsistency between the successive statements in the file, which are compared line by line.
Excluding violence and the overcoming of the will. The move from paragraph 2 to paragraph 1 is worth two years at the bottom of the range and is often the realistic objective. It rests on the forensic report where no injury consistent with force is described, and on the toxicological evidence where the case asserts that the complainant was incapable of consenting. A finding of incapacity requires objective evidence of the level of intoxication and not merely a later inability to recall, and the distinction is regularly decisive.
Detention, procedural position and the passage of time. Because pre-trial detention is the norm, the first hearing is a substantive stage of the defence and not a formality: the arguments on flight risk, on the existence of a fixed address and on the offer of alternative measures such as the surrender of the passport and regular reporting are prepared before it. For a foreign national, obtaining release on those conditions is frequently the single most valuable outcome of the early phase, since the investigation of these cases extends over many months.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.