Article 588 quinquies b permits the authorisation of technical devices for tracking and location where established reasons of necessity are present and the measure is proportionate, and it regulates the urgent placing by the judicial police subject to judicial ratification within twenty four hours.
1. Where established reasons of necessity are present and the measure is proportionate, the competent judge may authorise the use of technical devices or means of tracking and location.
2. The authorisation must specify the technical means which is to be used.
3. The providers, agents and persons referred to in Article 588 ter e are obliged to give to the judge, to the public prosecutor and to the officers of the judicial police designated for the execution of the measure the assistance and cooperation necessary to facilitate compliance with the orders by which the tracking is ordered, under warning of incurring the offence of disobedience.
4. Where reasons of urgency are present which give reasonable cause to fear that, if the tracking and location device or technical means is not placed immediately, the investigation will be frustrated, the judicial police may proceed to place it, reporting as soon as possible, and in any event within a maximum period of twenty four hours, to the judicial authority, which may ratify the measure adopted or order its immediate cessation within the same period. In the latter case, the information obtained from the device placed shall have no effect in the proceedings.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.
Specification of the technical means. Paragraph 2 requires the authorisation to identify the means to be used. A generic authorisation, or the use of a means other than that authorised, exceeds the judicial cover and is a ground for the exclusion of the data obtained.
Compliance with the periods in urgent cases. The urgent placing must be reported within twenty four hours and ratified within the same period. A report or a ratification which is out of time is not remedied retrospectively, and paragraph 4 itself provides that the information obtained shall have no effect.
Insufficiency of the reasons of necessity. The measure is subsidiary. Where the same result could have been obtained by ordinary surveillance or by data already held, the requirement of necessity is not met, which is the ordinary ground of challenge to the authorising decision.
Scope of the data obtained. Location data reveal the movements of persons other than the person under investigation. Contesting the retention and use of data unconnected with the object of the investigation limits the material which may be relied upon at trial.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.