Article 803 ter e defines the object of the autonomous confiscation procedure, which permits confiscation to be sought where the action has not previously been exercised, in particular where the prosecution has reserved its determination or where the perpetrator has died or cannot be tried.
1. The action by which the confiscation of assets, effects or gains, or of a value equivalent to them, is sought may be the object of the autonomous confiscation procedure regulated in this Title where it has not previously been exercised, save as provided in Article 803 ter p.
2. In particular, this procedure shall be applicable in the following cases:
a) Where the prosecutor confines the written indictment to seeking the confiscation of assets, expressly reserving their determination for this procedure.
b) Where it is sought as a consequence of the commission of a punishable act whose perpetrator has died or cannot be tried by reason of failure to appear or of incapacity to attend trial.
3. In the case of a reservation of the action by the prosecutor, the autonomous confiscation procedure may be commenced only once the proceedings in which the criminal liabilities of the accused person are determined have concluded with a final judgment.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.
Express character of the reservation. Paragraph 2(a) requires the reservation to be made expressly in the written indictment. Where the indictment sought the confiscation without reserving its determination, or made no reference to it, the autonomous procedure is not available and the point may be raised as an objection.
Requirement of a prior final judgment. Paragraph 3 conditions the commencement of the procedure upon a final judgment in the criminal case. A procedure commenced before that judgment becomes final is premature, and the objection must be raised at the outset.
Lawful origin of the assets. The object of the procedure is confined to the assets. Documentary evidence of their lawful origin, of the income which financed them and of their disconnection from the punishable act is the whole of the defence, which is habitually built upon expert accounting evidence.
Position of third parties affected. The procedure may reach assets held by persons who were not accused. Establishing their good faith and the consideration given for the acquisition is the ordinary route by which the assets are excluded from the confiscation.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.