Article 399 bis punishes the forgery of credit or debit cards, travellers cheques and other non cash payment instruments, together with their possession for distribution, their knowing use by a person who did not take part in the forgery, and their possession for fraudulent use.
1. Whoever alters, copies, reproduces or in any other way forges credit or debit cards, travellers cheques or any other non cash payment instrument shall be punished with imprisonment of four to eight years.
The penalty shall be imposed in its upper half where the forged instruments affect a generality of persons or where the acts are committed within a criminal organisation devoted to those activities.
Where, in accordance with the provisions of Article 31 bis, a legal person is liable for the foregoing offences, a fine of two to five years shall be imposed upon it. Having regard to the rules laid down in Article 66 bis, judges and courts may also impose the penalties set out in subparagraphs (b) to (g) of paragraph 7 of Article 33.
2. The possession of forged credit or debit cards, travellers cheques or any other non cash payment instruments, intended for distribution or trafficking, shall be punished with the penalty laid down for the forgery.
3. Whoever, without having taken part in the forgery, uses, to the detriment of another and knowing of the falsity, forged credit or debit cards, travellers cheques or any other non cash payment instruments shall be punished with imprisonment of two to five years.
4. Whoever, for fraudulent use and knowing of their falsity, possesses or obtains, for that person or for a third party, credit or debit cards, travellers cheques or any other non cash payment instrument shall be punished with imprisonment of one to two years.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Delimitation of the four frames. The article contains four frames ranging from one to eight years for conduct which is factually close. Establishing that the accused neither forged the instrument nor held it for distribution, but merely possessed it, reduces the exposure by several years.
Knowledge of the falsity. Paragraphs 3 and 4 require actual knowledge. Where the card was received from a third party, or where its appearance did not reveal the forgery, the subjective element fails and the conduct may amount at most to a fraud.
Attribution of the digital transactions. The correlation between a transaction and a person requires more than the possession of the card. The location data, the video recordings and the identification at the point of sale are the material upon which that attribution is contested.
Concurrence with the fraud. The use of a forged instrument habitually involves a fraud under Article 248 as well. Arguing the medial concurrence, or the absorption, prevents a separate accumulation of penalties for a single course of conduct.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.