Article 76 fixes the maximum effective term of enforcement at three times the most serious penalty imposed, with an absolute ceiling of twenty years and exceptional ceilings of twenty five, thirty and forty years. The limitation applies even where the penalties were imposed in different proceedings.
1. Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding article, the maximum effective term of enforcement of the sentence of the offender may not exceed three times the term of the most serious of the penalties incurred, and those which fall to be so declared shall be declared extinguished once the penalties already imposed cover that maximum, which may not exceed 20 years. Exceptionally, that maximum limit shall be:
a) 25 years, where the subject has been convicted of two or more offences and one of them is punishable by law with imprisonment of up to 20 years.
b) 30 years, where the subject has been convicted of two or more offences and one of them is punishable by law with imprisonment exceeding 20 years.
c) 40 years, where the subject has been convicted of two or more offences and at least two of them are punishable by law with imprisonment exceeding 20 years.
d) 40 years, where the subject has been convicted of two or more offences relating to terrorist organisations and groups and of terrorism offences under Chapter VII of Title XXII of Book II of this Code and one of them is punishable by law with imprisonment exceeding 20 years.
e) Where the subject has been convicted of two or more offences and at least one of them is punishable by law with reviewable permanent imprisonment, the provisions of Articles 92 and 78 bis shall apply.
2. The limitation shall apply even where the penalties have been imposed in different proceedings, where they were imposed for acts committed before the date on which those which, being the object of accumulation, were tried first.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Selection of the basis of calculation. The most serious penalty imposed governs the triple and, indirectly, the applicable ceiling. Reviewing the enforcement records in order to identify that penalty correctly, including penalties served in other proceedings, has a direct effect of years upon the result.
Connection in time for accumulation. Paragraph 2 does not require any material connection between the offences, only that the acts were committed before the trial of the first of the accumulated proceedings. The case law has progressively broadened that criterion, and a chronological table of the acts and of the trials is the instrument which supports the application.
Convictions handed down abroad. The accumulation of sentences served in other States is governed by the instruments of mutual recognition and by the case law on their equivalence. Raising the question at the enforcement stage is habitually the only route by which those periods are taken into account.
Effect upon the regime of enforcement. The maximum resulting from this article conditions the calculation of the periods for classification in the third degree and for parole. Applying for accumulation is therefore not a merely formal step but the precondition of any subsequent application under Articles 36 and 90.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.