info@societejuridique.com
Madrid: Paseo de la Castellana 216 8 ª Planta
Alicante: Av. Ansaldo Nº31, local 16
24h emergencies: 669 30 21 13

Social media:

Article 95 Spanish Criminal Code: Requirements for the imposition of security measures

Article 95 conditions the imposition of a security measure upon the commission of an act provided for as an offence and upon a prognosis of future conduct revealing the probability of the commission of further offences. Where the penalty which might have been imposed was not custodial, only the measures of Article 96.3 are available.

Wording of Article 95 of the Spanish Criminal Code

1. Security measures shall be applied by the judge or court, after such reports as it considers appropriate, to the persons falling within the cases provided for in the following Chapter of this Code, provided that the following circumstances are present:

1. That the subject has committed an act provided for as an offence.

2. That from the act and from the personal circumstances of the subject a prognosis of future conduct may be deduced which reveals the probability of the commission of further offences.

2. Where the penalty which might have been imposed for the offence committed was not a custodial one, the sentencing judge or court may order only one or more of the measures provided for in Article 96.3.

Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.

Sentencing range. The article does not lay down a penalty. It sets the requirements for the imposition of a security measure and restricts the court, where the penalty which might have been imposed was not custodial, to the non custodial measures of Article 96.3.

Elements of the offence

  1. The commission of an act provided for as an offence, which excludes the imposition of a measure in the absence of a typical act.
  2. A prognosis of future conduct, deduced from the act and from the personal circumstances of the subject, revealing the probability of the commission of further offences.
  3. The prior reports which the court considers appropriate, habitually forensic psychiatric reports.
  4. That the measure fall within the catalogue of the following Chapter and, where the penalty which might have been imposed was not custodial, within Article 96.3.

Defence strategy

Insufficiency of the prognosis of dangerousness. The measure cannot rest upon the diagnosis alone. What must be established is a probability of further offences deduced from the act and from the personal circumstances, and the absence of a reasoned assessment on that point is a defect of motivation capable of being raised on appeal.

The ceiling of proportionality. Article 6.2 prevents the measure from being more burdensome than the penalty applicable in the abstract to the act committed, and from exceeding the point at which the dangerousness ceases. That ceiling is the principal instrument for limiting the duration of any confinement.

Choice of the least restrictive measure. Where the penalty which might have been imposed was not custodial, paragraph 2 restricts the court to the non custodial measures of Article 96.3. Even outside that case, outpatient treatment and supervised release are habitually sufficient to address the prognosis relied upon.

Review of the measure during enforcement. The measure is not immutable. Articles 97 and 98 permit its cessation, substitution or suspension in the light of the evolution of the subject, and periodic reports and applications for review are the means by which that outcome is obtained.

Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.

This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
Londres: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, Reino Unido
París: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, Francia
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert es un despacho de abogados con sedes en Madrid, Alicante, Londres y París, especializado en defensa y acusación penal, delitos económicos y corporativos y derecho tecnológico. Trabajamos con orientación estratégica en procedimientos penales complejos, propiedad intelectual y análisis forense avanzado, y prestamos consultoría jurídica, compliance y escudos de protección a particulares y empresas. Atendemos desde Alicante y Madrid, con consulta online en toda España y asistencia al detenido 24 horas. Resuelva sus dudas en las preguntas frecuentes o solicite una primera consulta.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h