Medicine is an obligation of means, not of results. Negligence requires a departure from the lex artis, the professional standard applicable at the time, and a causal link with the harm suffered.
For that reason we never file a claim without a prior medical opinion. An unfavourable expert report obtained early saves you a case that was lost before it started, and it costs a fraction of the litigation.
The criminal route requires gross negligence and rarely succeeds. The civil route (private healthcare) or the administrative route (public healthcare) compensates more broadly and applies a different standard of proof. The choice is made case by case, always with the limitation periods in mind, because they are short and unforgiving.
The complete medical records, operating notes and evidence of the losses suffered. If you do not have the records yet, we request them for you.
Medicine is an obligation of means, not of results. A claim requires a departure from the lex artis, the professional standard applicable at the time and in those circumstances, and a causal link between that departure and the harm suffered. Complications that were properly warned about and properly managed are not negligence, however devastating they feel.
For that reason we never file a claim without a prior medical opinion. An unfavourable expert report obtained early costs a fraction of the litigation and saves you a case that was lost before it started. We would rather tell you that in the first month than in the third year.
The criminal route requires gross negligence and rarely succeeds; it is emotionally satisfying and legally unproductive in most cases. The civil route applies to private healthcare, and the administrative route to the public health service. Both compensate more broadly and apply a different standard of proof.
The choice is made case by case, and always with the limitation periods in mind. They are short, they run from different moments depending on the route, and missing them ends the matter regardless of the merits.
A frequently decisive point, and one clients rarely think of. If the risk that materialised was never explained to you, or the consent form was signed in the corridor minutes before surgery, or it was in Spanish and nobody translated it, there may be liability even where the treatment itself was faultless.
What we need: the complete medical records, operating notes, and evidence of the losses suffered. If you do not have the records, we request them on your behalf.
The outcome was terrible. Is that not proof of negligence? No, and this is the hardest thing to accept. Medicine guarantees care, not results. The question is whether the standard of care was breached, which is why we start with an independent medical opinion rather than a claim.
How long do I have to bring a claim? Less time than you think, and the clock runs from different moments depending on the route. This is the single most common reason good cases are lost.
I signed a consent form. Does that end it? Not necessarily. If the specific risk that materialised was not explained, or the form was signed minutes before surgery, or it was in Spanish with no translation, liability can still arise.
Public or private hospital: does it change anything? Yes, entirely. Private care goes through the civil courts, public care through the administrative route, with different deadlines and different procedures.