Article 120 of the Spanish Criminal Code lists who answers civilly in default of the convicted person: curators, owners of media outlets, owners of establishments, businesses for offences committed by their employees in the course of their duties, and vehicle owners. It is the usual route for directing the claim against the solvent company.
The following are also civilly liable, in default of those criminally liable:
1. Curators with full powers of representation who live with the person they support, provided there is fault or negligence on their part.
2. Natural or legal persons owning publishing houses, newspapers, magazines, radio or television stations or any other written, spoken or visual media, for offences committed using the media they own, without prejudice to Article 212.
3. Natural or legal persons, for offences committed in the establishments they own, where the persons managing them or their employees have infringed police regulations or provisions of the authority connected with the punishable act, so that it would not have occurred without that infringement.
4. Natural or legal persons engaged in any industry or trade, for offences committed by their employees or agents, representatives or managers in the performance of their obligations or services.
5. Natural or legal persons owning vehicles capable of creating risks for third parties, for offences committed in the use of those vehicles by their employees, representatives or authorised persons.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Breaking the functional link. The company does not answer for any offence of its employee, only for those committed in the performance of their duties. Complete deviation, acts alien to the service or committed outside working hours and premises break the required nexus.
Requiring the regulatory breach. For establishments the case law demands infringement of rules causally connected with the offence; its absence bars condemnation of the owner.
Enforcing subsidiarity. Enforcement must first target the offender; at least summary excussion of their assets is a precondition of the subsidiary route.
Distinguishing Article 121. Public administrations have their own regime; choosing the wrong channel causes nullities and delays the defence can use.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.