Article 305 bis of the Spanish Criminal Code aggravates tax fraud where the sum evaded exceeds 600,000 euros, the fraud is committed within a criminal organisation or group, or interposed persons or entities, fiduciary instruments or tax havens are used to conceal the taxpayer’s identity, the amount evaded or their assets. It raises the penalty and, with it, the limitation period to ten years.
Also cited as: article 305 bis Spanish Criminal Code · art. 305 bis CP · Spanish Penal Code article 305 bis · artículo 305 bis del Código Penal.
1. The offence against the Public Treasury shall be punished with imprisonment of two to six years and a fine of double to six times the sum evaded where the fraud is committed with any of the following circumstances:
a) The sum evaded exceeds six hundred thousand euros.
b) The fraud has been committed within a criminal organisation or group.
c) The use of interposed natural or legal persons or entities without legal personality, fiduciary businesses or instruments, or tax havens or nil-taxation territories, conceals or hinders the identification of the taxpayer or of the person responsible, the determination of the amount evaded or of their assets.
2. All the remaining provisions of Article 305 shall apply to the cases described in this article.
In these cases, in addition to the penalties indicated, the person responsible shall lose the possibility of obtaining public subsidies or aid and the right to enjoy tax or Social Security benefits or incentives for a period of four to eight years.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Fighting the quota. The sum evaded is an element of the offence and its calculation admits counter-expertise: timing rules, deductible expenses and the classification of transactions can bring the quota under the 600,000-euro threshold or under the basic 120,000.
Contesting the structure’s purpose. Not every interposed company or foreign account triggers the circumstance: its concrete capacity to conceal must be proved. Structures with real economic substance and lawful purpose fall outside.
Regularising in time. Full and truthful regularisation before notice of inspection, complaint or judicial attribution exempts from liability in the aggravated form too, through the referral to Article 305(4).
Watching the split limitation periods. The aggravated offence prescribes at ten years, the basic one at five; losing the aggravation often drags the whole case into limitation, merging both debates into one.
Defence in this area
If you or your company are facing proceedings in this area, the firm provides defence and prosecution in Alicante and Madrid, with 24-hour assistance to detained persons.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.
Two to six years’ imprisonment and a fine of double to six times the sum evaded, plus loss of subsidies and tax or Social Security benefits for four to eight years. All other Article 305 rules apply.
A tax offence under Article 305 with all its elements, including a sum above 120,000 euros. One of the three listed circumstances: sum above 600,000 euros, criminal organisation or group, or concealment structures. In the third, the actual capacity of the interposition or nil-taxation territory to hinder identification of the taxpayer, the amount or the assets. The full referral to Article 305, including regularisation as a ground of exemption.
Fighting the quota. The sum evaded is an element of the offence and its calculation admits counter-expertise: timing rules, deductible expenses and the classification of transactions can bring the quota under the 600,000-euro threshold or under the basic 120,000. Contesting the structure’s purpose. Not every interposed company or foreign account triggers the circumstance: its concrete capacity to conceal must be proved. Structures with real economic substance and lawful purpose fall outside. Regularising in time. Full and truthful regularisation before notice of inspection, complaint or judicial attribution exempts from liability in the aggravated form too, through the referral to Article 305(4). Watching the split limitation periods. The aggravated offence prescribes at ten years, the basic one at five.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.