Article 143 punishes inciting a suicide, cooperating in it and carrying out the death at the request of the person concerned. Paragraph 5 excludes criminal liability altogether where the death occurs in compliance with the organic act regulating euthanasia, and paragraph 4 requires a reduction of one or two degrees in the remaining cases of grave and incurable suffering.
1. Whoever incites another to commit suicide shall be punished with imprisonment of four to eight years.
2. Imprisonment of two to five years shall be imposed on whoever cooperates by acts necessary to the suicide of a person.
3. Imprisonment of six to ten years shall be imposed where the cooperation extends to the point of carrying out the death.
4. Whoever causes, or actively cooperates by necessary and direct acts in, the death of a person suffering from a serious, chronic and incapacitating condition or from a serious and incurable illness, with constant and unbearable physical or psychological suffering, at the express, serious and unequivocal request of that person, shall be punished with the penalty lowered by one or two degrees from those laid down in paragraphs 2 and 3.
5. Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, no criminal liability shall be incurred by whoever causes or actively cooperates in the death of another person in compliance with the organic act regulating euthanasia.
Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Organic Law 10/1995 of 23 November, the Spanish Criminal Code.
Absence of a necessary contribution. Paragraph 2 requires cooperation by acts without which the suicide would not have taken place. Ancillary, remote or merely moral assistance falls outside the provision, and the boundary between necessary cooperation and conduct which is not punishable is resolved by causal analysis of the evidence.
Capacity and autonomy of the person who dies. The whole provision presupposes a genuine decision of the person who dies. Clinical evidence of the capacity of that person, and of the absence of pressure or deception, is decisive because it determines whether the case belongs to this article or to Articles 138 and following.
Compliance with the euthanasia framework. Paragraph 5 operates as a complete exclusion of liability. The defence therefore centres on documenting the procedure laid down in the organic act regulating euthanasia, including the successive requests, the consultations and the authorisation, since a purely formal shortcoming does not restore the ordinary penalty where the substantive requirements were met.
Mitigation under paragraph 4. Where the statutory procedure was not followed, paragraph 4 still mandates a reduction of one or two degrees whenever the clinical situation and the request are established. Medical records and expert evidence on the suffering endured are the material on which that reduction is obtained.
Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.
This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.