Article 792 Spanish Criminal Procedure Act: Judgment on appeal in the abbreviated procedure

Article 792 fixes the periods for handing down the judgment on appeal and prohibits the appellate court from convicting a person acquitted at first instance, or from aggravating a conviction, by reason of an error in the assessment of the evidence. The remedy in such cases is the annulment of the judgment.

Also cited as: article 792 Spanish Criminal Procedure Act · art. 792 LECrim · LECrim article 792 · artículo 792 de la Ley de Enjuiciamiento Criminal.

Wording of Article 792 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act

1. The judgment on appeal shall be handed down within the five days following the oral hearing, or within the ten days following the receipt of the proceedings by the provincial court where it was not appropriate to hold such a hearing.

2. The judgment on appeal may not convict an accused person who was acquitted at first instance, nor aggravate the conviction which was imposed upon that person, by reason of an error in the assessment of the evidence in the terms provided for in the third subparagraph of Article 790.2.

Nevertheless, the judgment, whether of acquittal or of conviction, may be annulled and, in that case, the proceedings shall be returned to the body which handed down the decision appealed against. The judgment on appeal shall specify whether the nullity is to extend to the trial hearing and whether the principle of impartiality requires a new composition of the body of first instance for the purposes of the fresh trial of the case.

3. Where the judgment appealed against is annulled for a breach of an essential form of the procedure, the court shall, without entering upon the substance of the decision, order the procedure to be restored to the state in which it stood at the moment at which the defect was committed, without prejudice to the retention of the validity of all those acts whose content would be identical notwithstanding the defect committed.

4. Against the judgment handed down on appeal an appeal in cassation shall lie only in the cases provided for in Article 847, without prejudice to the provisions relating to the review of final judgments, or in the following article for the challenge of final judgments handed down in the absence of the accused person. Where no appeal is lodged against the judgment handed down on appeal, the file shall be returned to the court for the purposes of the enforcement of the decision.

5. The judgment shall be notified to those offended and injured by the offence, even where they have not appeared as parties in the case.

Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.

Effect. The provision imposes no penalty. Its effect is the prohibition of a conviction or of an aggravation on appeal by reason of an error in the assessment of the evidence, the alternative being the annulment of the judgment with a fresh trial before a differently composed body where impartiality so requires.

Requirements and procedure

  1. A judgment on appeal handed down within five days of the oral hearing, or within ten days of the receipt of the proceedings where no hearing was held.
  2. The prohibition of a conviction of a person acquitted, or of an aggravation of a conviction, founded upon an error in the assessment of the evidence.
  3. Where the judgment is annulled, a determination as to whether the nullity extends to the trial hearing and as to whether a new composition of the body of first instance is required.
  4. Where the annulment is for a breach of an essential form, the restoration of the procedure to the state in which it stood, retaining the acts whose content would have been identical.

Defence strategy

Limits upon the review of the evidence. Paragraph 2 codifies the case law on the immediacy of the evidence. Where the appeal of the prosecution rests upon a different reading of the oral evidence, the appellate court may not convict, and identifying that ground precisely in the response to the appeal is decisive.

Annulment as against a fresh conviction. Where the appellate court annuls the judgment, the case returns to the body of first instance. Arguing that the principle of impartiality requires a differently composed body is a specific point which the provision expressly requires the judgment to address.

Scope of the nullity. Paragraph 3 preserves the acts whose content would have been identical notwithstanding the defect. Delimiting which acts must be repeated, and which are preserved, determines whether the evidence already taken is retained and is habitually the real object of the dispute.

Access to cassation. Paragraph 4 confines the appeal in cassation to the cases of Article 847. Identifying at the outset whether the case falls within that provision determines the drafting of the appeal on appeal, since grounds not raised there cannot be introduced later.

Defence in this area

If you or your company are facing proceedings in this area, the firm provides defence and prosecution in Alicante and Madrid, with 24-hour assistance to detained persons.

Are you under investigation or facing charges in Spain? Société Juridique acts for foreign nationals throughout Spain, with offices in Alicante and Madrid and a 24-hour custody line. +34 669 30 21 13 or enquire online.

This entry is provided for information only and does not constitute legal advice. The application of any provision depends on the circumstances of the individual case and requires examination of the case file by a qualified lawyer.

Frequently asked questions

What effect does the application of Article 792 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act produce?

The provision imposes no penalty. Its effect is the prohibition of a conviction or of an aggravation on appeal by reason of an error in the assessment of the evidence, the alternative being the annulment of the judgment with a fresh trial before a differently composed body where impartiality so requires.

What requirements and procedure does Article 792 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act lay down?

A judgment on appeal handed down within five days of the oral hearing, or within ten days of the receipt of the proceedings where no hearing was held. The prohibition of a conviction of a person acquitted, or of an aggravation of a conviction, founded upon an error in the assessment of the evidence. Where the judgment is annulled, a determination as to whether the nullity extends to the trial hearing and as to whether a new composition of the body of first instance is required. Where the annulment is for a breach of an essential form, the restoration of the procedure to the state in which it stood, retaining the acts whose content would have been identical.

How does the defence make use of Article 792 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act?

Limits upon the review of the evidence. Paragraph 2 codifies the case law on the immediacy of the evidence. Where the appeal of the prosecution rests upon a different reading of the oral evidence, the appellate court may not convict, and identifying that ground precisely in the response to the appeal is decisive. Annulment as against a fresh conviction. Where the appellate court annuls the judgment, the case returns to the body of first instance. Arguing that the principle of impartiality requires a differently composed body is a specific point which the provision expressly requires the judgment to address. Scope of the nullity. Paragraph 3 preserves the acts whose content would have been identical notwithstanding the defect.

Is the English text of Article 792 of the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act official?

Working translation prepared by Société Juridique from the consolidated Spanish text published by the Official State Gazette. It has no official status: the only authoritative version is the Spanish original, available at the Official State Gazette and reproduced verbatim in our Spanish-language entry for this provision. Source: Royal Decree of 14 September 1882 approving the Spanish Criminal Procedure Act.

Logotipos-abogacia-scje
Paseo De La Castellana 216 8º 28046 Madrid
Alicante – Playa de San Juan Av. Ansaldo 31, local 16, 03540 Alicante
London: 20 Wenlock Road, N1 7GU, United Kingdom
Paris: 72 Faubourg St Honoré, 75008, France
info@societejuridique.com

Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert is a law firm with offices in Madrid, Alicante, London and Paris, specialising in criminal law, technology law and economic and corporate crime. We provide strategic guidance in complex criminal proceedings, intellectual property and technological resources for legal decision-making with advanced forensic analysis. Our multidisciplinary team combines legal experience, legal intelligence and personal attention to deliver effective solutions adapted to each case. Legal assistance available 24 hours a day and online consultations.

Copyright © 2026 Société de Conseil Juridique et Expert S.L.

EspanolEnglishFrancaisРусскийItalianoDeutsch
WhatsApp · Urgencias 24h