Spanish law grades assault by the injury caused and the means used: a minor offence (delito leve), injuries requiring medical treatment, or aggravated injuries where a weapon or dangerous object was used. The sentencing gap between them is enormous, and it turns on the parte de lesiones, the medical report.
We have that report examined as a matter of course. The distinction between simple first aid and subsequent medical treatment is frequently arguable, and it can move a case out of the prison bracket altogether.
These cases go to specialised courts and move fast. A protection order with immediate removal from the home can be issued within hours, often before you have properly told your side. The first statement, made without advice, follows the case to trial.
We act for the accused and for victims wishing to join as private prosecutors.
Attendance from the police station, challenge to the medical report, self-defence and provocation where they apply, and negotiation where it serves you. See also criminal defence in Alicante.
Everything turns on a technical distinction. If the injuries required only first aid, the offence is minor and the penalty is a fine. If they required subsequent medical or surgical treatment, it becomes the offence of causing injury, and prison enters the picture.
That line is far more arguable than it looks. Stitches, immobilisation or a course of medication are routinely presented as treatment when the case law does not always classify them that way. Having the parte de lesiones reviewed by an independent forensic doctor is often what moves a case out of the custodial bracket altogether.
These cases go to specialised courts and move at speed. A protection order removing you from the family home and prohibiting all contact can be issued within hours, often before you have properly given your account.
Two mistakes recur and both are expensive. The first is giving a statement immediately, without advice, on the assumption that the truth will speak for itself. The second is contacting the complainant despite the order, which is a fresh offence in its own right, independent of the underlying case, and which destroys your credibility at trial.
We act both for the accused and for victims who wish to join the proceedings as private prosecutors.
Self-defence requires an unlawful attack, a rationally necessary response, and no sufficient provocation on your part. It is rarely accepted in full, but partial acceptance reduces the sentence significantly.
In a fight outside a bar, the central question is always who began it and whether the response was proportionate. CCTV and immediate witnesses decide that question, and they need to be secured before they are lost, which is a matter of days, not weeks.
It was self-defence. Is that enough? It has to meet three conditions: an unlawful attack, a rationally necessary response, and no sufficient provocation from you. Full acquittals on this basis are rare, but partial acceptance reduces the sentence substantially, and it is worth arguing properly.
The other person started it, but I hit harder. Where does that leave me? Proportionality is where these cases are won and lost. Being attacked does not authorise any response, and the courts look closely at the moment the threat ended.
My partner has withdrawn the complaint. Is it over? No. In domestic violence cases the prosecution continues regardless of the complainant’s wishes. This surprises almost every foreign client, and acting as though the case has gone away is how people end up convicted in their absence.
There is a restraining order and we want to talk. Can we? No. Not even if you both agree, not even by message. Breaching it is a separate offence and it is the fastest route to prison in the entire system.